2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2012.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial variation in RNA:DNA ratios of Diporeia spp. in the Great Lakes region

Abstract: Over the past two decades, Diporeia in all of the Laurentian Great Lakes, except Superior, have declined dramatically. These declines have seemingly coincided with expansion of invasive Dreissena polymorpha and D. bugensis, however the exact mechanisms underlying decreasing Diporeia densities are obscure. We explored the use of RNA:DNA (R/D) ratios as a conditional index for Diporeia by experimentally demonstrating that Diporeia R/D responds to periods of starvation. Moreover, during 2008-2009 we collected Dip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bonamia ostreae RNA detection limit appeared 10 times lower than DNA one, indicating a higher sensitivity of the RNA‐based approach. While the gene encoding 18S RNA might be present in several copies in the parasite genome, RNA and more particularly ribosomal RNA are expected to be much more abundant, depending notably on the metabolism of the cells (Roberts et al , 2011; Ryan et al , 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bonamia ostreae RNA detection limit appeared 10 times lower than DNA one, indicating a higher sensitivity of the RNA‐based approach. While the gene encoding 18S RNA might be present in several copies in the parasite genome, RNA and more particularly ribosomal RNA are expected to be much more abundant, depending notably on the metabolism of the cells (Roberts et al , 2011; Ryan et al , 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finger Lakes benthic communities in central New York; Watkins et al., ). Hypotheses attributing changes in Diporeia abundance to niche displacement and bivalve‐imposed food limitation (either through the interception of detrital deposits or mitigation of calcite‐dependent phytoplankton blooms) have been refuted both in situ and in mesocosm trials (Dermott, Bonnell, & Jarvis, ; Nalepa, Fanslow, & Foley, ; Nalepa et al., ; Ryan, Sepúlveda, Nalepa, & Höök, ; Watkins et al., ). Diporeia population densities are also poorly associated with variation in lake productivity, benthic flux of organic carbon and fish predation (Watkins et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each site, we collected three additional grab samples, which were stored in 10% formalin stained with Rose Bengal until processing. Upon return to the laboratory, we picked organisms from these samples under a dissecting microscope and placed them in 70% ethanol for long-term storage (see Ryan et al 2012 for details). Historic specimens of Diporeia were obtained from samples collected in fall from sites C-5 and H-11 in Lake Michigan in 1986, 1992 (Fig.…”
Section: Field Collections and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%