2017
DOI: 10.1556/168.2017.18.2.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial variation of mammal richness, functional and phylogenetic diversity in the Mexican transition zone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
22
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
22
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Heterogeneous landscapes offer more niches and complementary resources [78] than homogeneous landscapes and, hence, more functional groups are expected to coexist in such heterogeneous areas. In the Cantabrian Mountains, we found a positive relationship between landscape heterogeneity and functional diversity, consistent with the findings of other studies carried out in Central America [79] and Romania [80]. In mountains, the landscape is heterogeneous [37] as a result of topographic and climatic complexity, as well as traditional human intervention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Heterogeneous landscapes offer more niches and complementary resources [78] than homogeneous landscapes and, hence, more functional groups are expected to coexist in such heterogeneous areas. In the Cantabrian Mountains, we found a positive relationship between landscape heterogeneity and functional diversity, consistent with the findings of other studies carried out in Central America [79] and Romania [80]. In mountains, the landscape is heterogeneous [37] as a result of topographic and climatic complexity, as well as traditional human intervention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, this approach has been focused only on the number of species. Therefore, to achieve a fuller understanding of the spatial patterns of biodiversity and its determinants, i.e., the environmental factors that regulate biodiversity, the spatial distribution of other facets or dimensions of biodiversity has become the subject of recent studies [510]. One of these dimensions is functional diversity, in which species are characterized by their functional traits, that are suspected to be relevant in their performance in specific habitats, providing a greater understanding of the links that exist between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning [8, 1113].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has recently been found that the species richness and functional diversity of mammals do not have a marked spatial congruence. Therefore, a disparity or spatial mismatch is often found in these dimensions of diversity; while species richness often correlates closely with environmental conditions, such as elevation, temperature and productivity, functional diversity depends on both environmental conditions and ecological interactions among coexisting species, such as competence [7, 8, 10, 23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, several regional studies have used the total PD of a given site (often a grid cell) as its conservation value and thus did not consider that branches can be shared among sites. This departure from the basic framework of conservation planning based on the complementarity of sites (Margules and Pressey 2000) may originate from the community ecology framework where the total PD of a site is of interest (e.g., Gómez-Ortiz et al 2017; see the section titled Why Approaches in Community Ecology and Conservation Biology Should Be Different). Yet, in conservation biology, the purpose to maximize the protection of a region's diversity is not achieved with this method because sites with the highest total PD will most likely share branches and thus redundant information (Figure 1; Pollock et al 2017;Faith et al 2018a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%