2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-016-3101-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial variations in soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations related to stand characteristics in subtropical areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The soil is a well‐drained, red clay‐rich loam classified as an Alliti‐Udic Ferrosol in the Chinese Soil Taxonomy (CST), which corresponds to Acrisol in the World Reference Base for Soil Resources (IUSS Working Group WRB, ). Site details are provided by Jiang et al ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The soil is a well‐drained, red clay‐rich loam classified as an Alliti‐Udic Ferrosol in the Chinese Soil Taxonomy (CST), which corresponds to Acrisol in the World Reference Base for Soil Resources (IUSS Working Group WRB, ). Site details are provided by Jiang et al ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their small effect on the bioavailable P, understorey species were excluded from further analyses. The tree basal area (m 2 ha ‐1 ) was calculated as the sum of π(DBH/2) 2 of trees (DBH ≥4 cm) (Jiang et al, ). Detailed information on the stand characteristics is available in Ouyang et al () and Table S1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a semivariogram and a cross-variogram, appropriate models were fitted and the input parameters for the spatial interpolation of kriging and cokriging were provided (Cressie, 1993;Goovaerts, 1997). Three parameters of nugget (C 0 ), sill (C + C 0 ), and range (A) can show the spatial dependence of litter amount (Burgos, Madejón, Pérez-de-Mora, & Cabrera, 2006), and the degree of spatial autocorrelation can be evaluated using structure variance ratio, that is, the value of C 0 /(C 0 + C) (Jiang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Geostatistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil chemical variations can be primarily explained by climate (e.g., leaching intensity and duration of droughts, including El Nino) and geology (geological age, silicate clays, Fe oxides, and bedrock P concentration) [18]. However, topography, soil texture, and stand characteristics contributed the most to spatial variations in soil organic C, and total N and P [19]. Spatial patterns of total P strongly resembled woody vegetation cover throughout the soil profile [20], but differed from total N predominately regulated by biotic factors (plant residues and microbial communities) [21], especially in subsurface soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%