2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial variations of human health risk associated with exposure to chlorination by-products occurring in drinking water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
39
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, all are greater than or equal to the acceptable risk level in the 95th percentile exposure scenario. The risk levels for both of the chemicals in this scenario for surfactant-added products surpass a higher acceptable risk level (1.0 Â 10 À4 ) preferred for some pollutants difficult to deal with, such as arsenic (Legay et al, 2011;Health Canada, 1998). Values of ratio of the median risk due to product use to the risk due to the mean background exposure are presented in Table S13.…”
Section: Carcinogenic Risk Assessment For Inhalation Exposurementioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, all are greater than or equal to the acceptable risk level in the 95th percentile exposure scenario. The risk levels for both of the chemicals in this scenario for surfactant-added products surpass a higher acceptable risk level (1.0 Â 10 À4 ) preferred for some pollutants difficult to deal with, such as arsenic (Legay et al, 2011;Health Canada, 1998). Values of ratio of the median risk due to product use to the risk due to the mean background exposure are presented in Table S13.…”
Section: Carcinogenic Risk Assessment For Inhalation Exposurementioning
confidence: 82%
“…Carcinogenic risks due to lifetime exposure to the background concentrations are 9.4 Â 10 À6 and 1.6 Â 10 À6 for chloroform and carbon tetrachloride, respectively. Both of the risk values are higher than the general acceptable risk level of 1.0 Â 10 À6 (Legay et al, 2011;Health Canada, 1998). Although all median scenario risk values are <1.0 Â 10 À6 for both of the chemicals, these risks are additional to the background risks.…”
Section: Carcinogenic Risk Assessment For Inhalation Exposurementioning
confidence: 88%
“…UVVis, TOC and LC-MS analyses confirmed the successful human health, owing to their chronic toxicity, persistence, and bioaccumulation [3,4]. There are various toxicological and epidemiological studies that have been carried out on CBPs in drinking water and their suspected carcinogenic and other adverse health effects [5]. Increase in farming activities has entailed increased usage of agrochemicals (herbicides, fungicides, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Until date, chlorine is one of the most inexpensive disinfectants (Clark et al 1994;Clark et al 1998;USEPA 2006;Chowdhury et al 2007). However, chlorination process poses chemical threat to human health due to DBPs (Legay et al 2011). In the presence of precursors such as NOM, the DBPs are formed (Mesdaghinia et al 2005).…”
Section: Future Perspectives and Potential Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The human exposure to DBPs in drinking water occurs through multiple routes including ingestion, inhalation and dermal contact during regular indoor activities such as swimming, bathing and showering (Legay et al 2011;Chowdhury et al 2011). To overcome these drawbacks, alternative disinfectants such as ozone, chloramine among others are used to avoid or reduce chlorinated DBPs in waters (Simate et al 2012).…”
Section: Future Perspectives and Potential Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%