Echinoderm photoreception is a well-studied but puzzling phenomenon. Light-mediated behaviors are ubiquitous in this phylum, including simple phototaxis, covering reactions, UV avoidance, homing, polarization sensitivity, color changes, shelter seeking, diurnal migrations and movement towards small dark objects (Millot, 1954;Millot, 1955;Thornton, 1956;Yoshida, 1966;Millot and Yoshida, 1960;Scheibling, 1980;Hendler, 1984;Johnsen, 1994;Johnsen and Kier, 1999;Adams, 2001;Blevins and Johnsen, 2004). However, the underlying architecture and abilities of this system have remained mysterious.With the exception of the ocelli found at the tips of the arms of certain asteroids and the tentacular nerves of the holothurian Opheodesoma spectabilis, echinoderms have no discrete visual organs (reviewed by Yoshida et al., 1983). Instead, neurological and behavioral evidence suggests that their photosensitivity is diffuse and located above, below and even within the calcitic endoskeleton (Yoshida, 1979;Moore and Cobb, 1985;Aizenberg, 2001). More recently, Burke et al. (Burke et al., 2006) and Raible et al. (Raible et al., 2006) independently analyzed the genome of the echinoid Strongylocentrotus purpuratus and found six opsins from at least three pan-bilaterian families (r-opsin, c-opsin, G o -opsin) that were most strongly expressed in the tube feet and the globiferous and tridentate pedicellariae (expression in the endoskeleton was not measured). While other recent work has found some remarkable adaptations in the endoskeleton of echinoderms, including polarizing filters, migrating pigments and arrays of microscopic lenses (Hendler, 1984;Johnsen, 1994;Aizenberg et al., 2001), no regional specialization akin to cephalization has been found, leaving open the question of the neurological and structural bases of these photobehaviors.Woodley (Woodley, 1982) attempted to reconcile the ability of the tropical urchin Diadema antillarum to move towards small, dark objects with its apparent lack of an image-forming eye by suggesting that the entire animal functions as a compound eye, with the spines screening off-axis light, much like screening pigments optically separate ommatidia in insect eyes (Land and Nilsson, 2002). Blevins and Johnsen tested this hypothesis using echinoids of the genus Echinometra and found that their visual resolution was on the order of that predicted by the spacing of their spines (~30deg.) (Blevins and Johnsen, 2004).This paper examines the visual resolution of S. purpuratus. Like Echinometra, it exhibits shelter-seeking behavior and is known to have a photosensitive test. However, the angular density of its spines is roughly double-triple that of Echinometra. We therefore performed similar experiments to those described by Blevins and Johnsen (Blevins and Johnsen, 2004) to determine whether S. purpuratus had correspondingly higher visual resolution. ; Monte Carlo simulation), showing that each urchin, whether it moved towards or away from the target, did so with high consistency. These results strongly sug...