“…The strength of the approach lies in providing a better understanding of the subjective logic of decisionmaking and the actions taken by household members. Despite of having received a wide range of criticism, which pointed out its theoretical and heuristic limitations, the approach is still considered by many as an indispensable tool for gaining a better understanding of rural (de Haan, 2012;de Haas, 2010;King, 2011;Mazibuko, 2012;Scoones, 2009; as well as urban (Farrington et al, 2002;Lohnert and Steinbrink, 2005;Rakodi, 1995Rakodi, , 2002 dynamics at the micro level. It is widely agreed on that the livelihood approach's weakness in conceptualizing (macro-) structural factors (Müller-Mahn and Verne, 2010;Scoones, 2009) and societal power relations beyond the realm of the household (de Haan, 2008(de Haan, , 2012 necessitates its complementation with other theoretical and analytical approaches (Bebbington and Batterbury, 2001;de Haan, 2012;Thieme, 2008;van Dijk, 2011).…”