Spatially contextualized analysis of energy use for commuting in India

Abstract

India's land transport GHG emissions are small in international comparison, but growing exponentially. Understanding of geographically-specific determinants of GHG emissions is crucial to devise lowcarbon sustainable development strategies. However, previous studies on transport patterns have been limited to socio-economic context in linear and stationary settings, and with limited spatial scope. Here, we use a machine learning tool to develop a nested typology that categorizes all 640 Indian districts according to the econometrically identified drivers of their commuting emissions. Results reveal that per capita commuting emissions significantly vary over space, after controlling for socioeconomic characteristics, and are strongly influenced by built environment (e.g. urbanization, and road density), and mobility-related variables (e.g. travel distance and travel modes). The commuting emissions of districts are characterized by unique, place-specific combinations of drivers. We find that income and urbanization are dominant classifiers of commuting emissions, while we explain more fine-grained patterns with mode choice and travel distance. Surprisingly the most urbanized areas with highest population density are also associated with the highest transport GHG emissions, a result that is explained by high car ownership. This result contrasts with insights from OECD countries, where commuting emissions are associated with low-density urban sprawl. Our findings demonstrate that low-carbon commuting in India is best advanced with spatially differentiated strategies.

The role of high-socioeconomic-status people in locking in or rapidly reducing energy-driven greenhouse gas emissions

“…Motor vehicles are the largest source of per capita GHG emissions in the United States 37 and the second-largest source in Europe, where they are responsible for 21% of personal GHG emissions among the top 1% of emitters 28 . Emissions from motor vehicles are highly correlated with income 11 and come overwhelmingly from private vehicle use 38 . These GHG emissions are affected by vehicle ownership, fuel economy and distance travelled.…”

A comparison of the health and environmental impacts of increasing urban density against increasing propensity to walk and cycle in Nashville, USA

“…From all the transport-related emissions, personal passenger vehicles accounted for 61% of the sector's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (US Environmental Protection Agency 2016). One of the strategies to decrease transport sector related GHG emissions is to increase active transport (walking and cycling) (Creutzig 2016, Ahmad et al 2017, Ahmad and Creutzig 2019.…”

Unique Opportunities of Island States to Transition to a Low-Carbon Mobility System

“…areas have higher car use than rural areas, and contrasts with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries which show inverse patterns [29]. Currently, Fiji's mobility patterns are sustainable, as modal shares are dominated by walking and using public transportation.…”

“…For urban residents, this increased to 27% car usage and 12% taxi; reflecting the aspirations of many to travel by car and the inadequacy of public transport to cater to this market. This urban-rural divide in car usage is mirrored in other developing economies, such as India, where more wealthy urban areas have higher car use than rural areas, and contrasts with the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries which show inverse patterns [29]. Currently, Fiji's mobility patterns are sustainable, as modal shares are dominated by walking and using public transportation.…”