2017
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2016.2609937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatially Coupled Codes Optimized for Magnetic Recording Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of Code 3 is better than the performance of Code 5 not only in the error floor region, but also in the waterfall region. An interesting observation is that, in the error profile of Code 3, we found no codewords of weights ∈ {6, 8} (which are (6, 0, 0, 9, 0) and (8, 0, 0, 12, 0) BASTs) despite the dominant presence of such low weight codewords in the error profiles of Codes 1, 2, and 5 (see also [5], [12], and [16]). From Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The performance of Code 3 is better than the performance of Code 5 not only in the error floor region, but also in the waterfall region. An interesting observation is that, in the error profile of Code 3, we found no codewords of weights ∈ {6, 8} (which are (6, 0, 0, 9, 0) and (8, 0, 0, 12, 0) BASTs) despite the dominant presence of such low weight codewords in the error profiles of Codes 1, 2, and 5 (see also [5], [12], and [16]). From Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…THE COMMON SUBSTRUCTURE AND ITS PATTERNS The idea of focusing on a common substructure in the design of the unlabeled graph of an SC code simplifies the optimization procedure. Additionally, minimizing the number of instances of the common substructure significantly reduces the multiplicity of several different types of detrimental objects simultaneously [16], [23], which is a lot more feasible compared with operating on all these detrimental objects separately (especially for partitioning). It was shown in [16] that the (4, 4(γ − 2)) UAS/UTS, γ ≥ 3, is the common substructure of interest for PR channels (unlike the case for AWGN [22], [23] and Flash channels [24], where the substructure of interest is the (3, 3(γ − 2))).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent results on SC codes include asymptotic analysis, e.g., [7], and finite length designs, e.g., [8]- [10]. Non-binary SC (NB-SC) codes designed using cutting vector (CV) partitioning and optimized for 1-D magnetic recording applications were introduced in [11]. The idea of partitioning the underlying block code by minimizing the overlap of its rows of circulants (so called minimum overlap (MO)) was recently introduced and applied to AWGN channels in [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%