2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2018.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatially-resolved 1H NMR relaxation-exchange measurements in heterogeneous media

Abstract: In the last decades, the 1 H NMR relaxation-exchange (REXSY) technique has become an essential tool for the molecular investigation of simple and complex fluids in heterogeneous porous solids and soft matter, where the mixing-time-evolution of crosscorrelated peaks enables a quantitative study of diffusive exchange kinetics in multicomponent systems. Here, we present a spatially-resolved implementation of the correlation technique, named , based on one-dimensional spatial mapping along using a rapid frequency-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most data-rich methods for elucidating spin relaxation processes in porous media are multidimensional relaxation correlation measurements. Indeed, two-dimensional (2D) relaxation–relaxation ( T 1 – T 2 and T 1 – T 2 , ) and diffusion–relaxation ( D – T 2 ) measurements are widely applied to characterize the dynamics of confined fluids, while higher-dimensional experiments, including spatially resolved variants, , have also been reported. Such measurements are of utility in the study of fluids confined to heterogeneous solids as they are essentially independent of the detailed chemical shift phenomena associated with traditional frequency-based NMR methods, wherein spectral peaks are likely to be (i) dominated by species away from the interface of interest and (ii) unfavorably broadened due to the effects of magnetic susceptibility differences at the solid–liquid interface, often requiring exotic approaches (see e.g., ref ) to avoid an intractable loss of spectral resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most data-rich methods for elucidating spin relaxation processes in porous media are multidimensional relaxation correlation measurements. Indeed, two-dimensional (2D) relaxation–relaxation ( T 1 – T 2 and T 1 – T 2 , ) and diffusion–relaxation ( D – T 2 ) measurements are widely applied to characterize the dynamics of confined fluids, while higher-dimensional experiments, including spatially resolved variants, , have also been reported. Such measurements are of utility in the study of fluids confined to heterogeneous solids as they are essentially independent of the detailed chemical shift phenomena associated with traditional frequency-based NMR methods, wherein spectral peaks are likely to be (i) dominated by species away from the interface of interest and (ii) unfavorably broadened due to the effects of magnetic susceptibility differences at the solid–liquid interface, often requiring exotic approaches (see e.g., ref ) to avoid an intractable loss of spectral resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 The most data-rich methods for elucidating spin relaxation processes in porous media are multidimensional relaxation correlation measurements. [17][18][19] Indeed, two-dimensional (2D) relaxation-relaxation ( 1 − 2 [20][21][22] and 2 − 2 23,24 ) and diffusion-relaxation ( − 2 [25][26][27][28] ) measurements are widely applied to characterise the dynamics of confined fluids, while higher-dimensional experiments, [29][30][31][32] including variants exhibiting spatial resolution, 33,34 have also been reported. Such measurements are of particular utility in the study of fluids confined to heterogeneous solids as they are essentially independent of the detailed chemical shift phenomena associated with traditional frequency-based NMR methods, wherein spectral peaks are likely to be (i) dominated by species away from the interface of interest, and (ii) unfavourably broadened due to the effects of magnetic susceptibility differences at the solid-liquid interface, 35 often requiring exotic approaches (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%