2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2011.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatially variable Rician noise in magnetic resonance imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Rician distribution is dependent on the value of the true signal . To estimate it, we apply the method proposed in [7]:…”
Section: Robust Motion Estimation With Explicit Signal Pdfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Rician distribution is dependent on the value of the true signal . To estimate it, we apply the method proposed in [7]:…”
Section: Robust Motion Estimation With Explicit Signal Pdfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, several approaches were presented in the literature in order to enhance the general DTI image quality. For instance, some of these DTI filtering methods are based on MRI noise regularization (Aja-Fernandez et al, 2008;Martin-Fernandez et al, 2009;Maximov et al, 2012;Tristán-Vega and Aja-Fernández, 2010), pre-filtering DWI images requested for DTI images reconstruction (Martin-Fernandez et al, 2009;Xu et al, 2010), noise attenuation on k-space (Basu et al, 2006), local neighborhood pattern analysis (Manjón et al, 2008), high-order partial differential equations (Bai and Feng, 2007;Moraschi et al, 2010), diffusion tensor…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, voxel-wise noise estimations from multiple, independent acquisition schemes are preferred over single acquisition methods (22,25). In addition, ROI-based noise estimates are not suitable for spatially varying noise distributions, as may result from the use of parallel imaging, which also requires the noise level to be estimated in a voxel-wise manner (2831). Since parallel imaging is routinely used to decrease acquisition time, background noise estimators are almost never preferred to voxel-wise methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a wide variety of noise correction methods available, including those that utilize lookup tables (3), global correction via a single noise correction term (1921), non-linear maximum likelihood (ML) or maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation which utilize Bessel functions in the measured signal model (12,25,32), nonlocal maximum likelihood estimation which sample neighboring voxels to determine spatially varying noise statistics (33,34), nonlinear diffusion filtering for spatially varying noise (35), spatially varying noise corrections involving confluent hypergeometric functions (36,37), and multistep weighting strategies to remove errors that can be introduced through the estimated weight factors (38). Although the more complicated noise correction techniques may have desirable theoretical properties under certain circumstances, they can be difficult to implement, require nonlinear optimization, and/or involve iterative fitting algorithms, which can be computationally demanding and may not guarantee a unique solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%