Plant respiration and photosynthesis are the two main processes influencing carbon (C) flux balance at leaf‐to‐ecosystem scales. The ratio of respiration to photosynthesis (R:A) or carbon use efficiency (CUE) is considered an important trait for determining global carbon storage in the near future. One school of thought assumes that R:A is constant in terrestrial productivity models, irrespective of biomass, climate, and species. Others believe it is variable, although within a limited range. Semiarid systems dominated by woody vegetation, such as sagebrush steppe, have been recognized as potentially important C sinks on regional to global scales in the context of future climate scenarios. Therefore, there is a critical need to study R:A over different organizational scales (i.e., at the leaf, whole plant, and ecosystem scales) to use this approach for future C flux predictions under climate change scenarios. The objective of this study was to compare leaf‐, shrub‐, and ecosystem‐scale R:A among three sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) communities, and to determine how R:A varies throughout the growing season (i.e., early, mid‐, and late summer) among these communities. We measured photosynthesis and respiration monthly in three sagebrush communities spanning a 685‐m elevation gradient at the Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed and Critical Zone Observatory in southwestern Idaho. Consistent with our expectations, we found large seasonal variations in R and A at all scales, but with differences in A among the three sagebrush communities significant only at the leaf scale. The R:A ratio was not significantly different among the three species at all organizational scales. However, the R:A ratio did vary among months at the leaf level and there was a statistical interaction between species and month at both leaf and shrub levels. Our study indicates that the R:A ratio is generally conservative, although not tightly constrained (range: 0.12–0.77) among three sagebrush species. Therefore, approaches that assume conservative R:A ratios in terrestrial productivity models need to be considered carefully to evaluate the impact of projected climatic changes on future C cycling in shrub‐dominated rangeland ecosystems.