2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-32255-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatio-temporal dynamics and aetiology of proliferative leg skin lesions in wild British finches

Abstract: Proliferative leg skin lesions have been described in wild finches in Europe although there have been no large-scale studies of their aetiology or epizootiology to date. Firstly, disease surveillance, utilising public reporting of observations of live wild finches was conducted in Great Britain (GB) and showed proliferative leg skin lesions in chaffinches (Fringilla coelebs) to be widespread. Seasonal variation was observed, with a peak during the winter months. Secondly, pathological investigations were perfo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It might be that the high number of Mesalgoides outnumbered the Knemidokoptes and gave a false negative result for Knemidokoptes at the skin scraping, or possibly the number of Knemidokoptes was low due to the therapy, or a combination of both. For the diagnostic workup of proliferative skin lesions of finches, it has been already highlighted the importance of laboratory examinations for the detection of papillomavirus, Knemidokoptes mites and avipox virus 3,4 . In our case, an extensive diagnostic workup identified the aetiology of the proliferative skin lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…It might be that the high number of Mesalgoides outnumbered the Knemidokoptes and gave a false negative result for Knemidokoptes at the skin scraping, or possibly the number of Knemidokoptes was low due to the therapy, or a combination of both. For the diagnostic workup of proliferative skin lesions of finches, it has been already highlighted the importance of laboratory examinations for the detection of papillomavirus, Knemidokoptes mites and avipox virus 3,4 . In our case, an extensive diagnostic workup identified the aetiology of the proliferative skin lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Most reports of knemidokoptosis in wild birds involve gregarious passerines such as the American robin (Turdus migratorius) and the common chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs) (Lawson et al, 2018a;Pence et al, 1999). In Great Britain (GB), knemidokoptosis is widespread in chaffinches and also occurs, albeit less frequently, in greenfinches (Chloris chloris), goldfinches (Carduelis carduelis), bullfinches (Pyrrhula pyrrhula), rooks (Corvus frugilegus), jackdaws (Corvus monedula) and carrion crows (Corvus corone) (Pennycott, 2016;Lawson et al, 2018a;). Whilst most cases in wild birds appear to be mild or moderate, it has been proposed that severe lesions may predispose individuals to predation, trauma or co-infection (Pence 2008;Lawson et al 2018a).…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Great Britain (GB), knemidokoptosis is widespread in chaffinches and also occurs, albeit less frequently, in greenfinches (Chloris chloris), goldfinches (Carduelis carduelis), bullfinches (Pyrrhula pyrrhula), rooks (Corvus frugilegus), jackdaws (Corvus monedula) and carrion crows (Corvus corone) (Pennycott, 2016;Lawson et al, 2018a;). Whilst most cases in wild birds appear to be mild or moderate, it has been proposed that severe lesions may predispose individuals to predation, trauma or co-infection (Pence 2008;Lawson et al 2018a).…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…35 Total reads of 1,029,601,630 (#4; sequencing depth 51x) and 1,000,503,256 (#6; sequencing depth 50x) were obtained and mapped to the reference canine F9 gene (NC_006621.3, region 109,501,341 to 109,533,798; CanFam3.1) using DNASTAR Lasergene Genomics Suite SeqMan NGen 15.2.0 (130). [36][37][38][39][40] Targeted genotyping of the promoter deletion was done by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification with primers cfa_F9_Ex1_F (5'-CCACTGAGGGAGATGGACAC-3') and cfa_F9_Ex1_R (5'-CCCACATGCTGACGACTAGA-3') resulting in a fragment of 328 bp (wildtype) or 327 bp (deletion) spanning the variant position. The resulting PCR products were either directly sequenced on an ABI 3730 Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Basel, Switzerland) or genotypes were determined by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis after cleavage with RsaI.…”
Section: Next-generation Sequencing and Genotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%