2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12088-016-0621-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatio-Temporal Monitoring and Ecological Significance of Retrievable Pelagic Heterotrophic Bacteria in Kongsfjorden, an Arctic Fjord

Abstract: Kongsfjorden is a glacial fjord in the Arctic that is influenced by both Atlantic and Arctic water masses. In the present report retrievable heterotrophic bacteria isolated from two distinct zones (outer and inner fjord) of Kongsfjorden was studied during summer to fall of 2012.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, very few studies have focused on diversity patterns in fjordic environments, particularly those of the eukaryotic community, often excluding large taxa and targeting specific groups such as protists (Orsi et al, 2012; Piquet et al, 2010). The results obtained on dominantly identified phyla in the present study are consistent with previous reports on marine and fjord systems, which were dominated by Proteobacteria (Aldunate et al, 2018; Sinha et al, 2017; Spietz et al, 2015; Vander Roost et al, 2018; Zaikova et al, 2010), Bacteroidetes (Aldunate et al, 2018; Fernández-Gómez et al, 2013; Sinha et al, 2017; Spietz et al, 2015), Opisthokonta (Del Campo et al, 2015), and SAR (Guillou et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To date, very few studies have focused on diversity patterns in fjordic environments, particularly those of the eukaryotic community, often excluding large taxa and targeting specific groups such as protists (Orsi et al, 2012; Piquet et al, 2010). The results obtained on dominantly identified phyla in the present study are consistent with previous reports on marine and fjord systems, which were dominated by Proteobacteria (Aldunate et al, 2018; Sinha et al, 2017; Spietz et al, 2015; Vander Roost et al, 2018; Zaikova et al, 2010), Bacteroidetes (Aldunate et al, 2018; Fernández-Gómez et al, 2013; Sinha et al, 2017; Spietz et al, 2015), Opisthokonta (Del Campo et al, 2015), and SAR (Guillou et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The ratios of bacterial production (BP) to primary production (PP) vary from 0.03 to 0.32 (Sturluson et al, 2008;Uchimiya et al, 2016;Piontek et al, 2021); in several sites of the Arctic Ocean, these ratios were higher than 0.11, a common value in other oceans (Kirchman et al, 1993;Ducklow et al, 1995), which indicates that the fraction of PP that passes through DOM-bacteria coupling is not low under cold conditions, signifying an important role of bacteria in the carbon dynamics within the Arctic Ocean. Bacterial assemblages in marine oligotrophic settings, such as the Arctic Ocean, exhibit a high degree of metabolic adaptability to be able End of July 1995 11 (0.97-28.0)5.9 (2.8-11.0)3.6 (2.4-4.7)1.9 (1.0-3.5) (Børsheim, 2000) Greenland Sea and Norwegian Sea 0-1 Sept 2000 0.22-6.0 (Naganuma et al, 2006) Chukchi Sea Shelf <20 10-26 Sept 2013 4.2-6.0 (Uchimiya et al, 2016) Coastal Beaufort Sea ≤32 26 July-2 Aug 2004 6.7 (Vallières et al, 2008) East Siberian Sea Shelf ≤47 5-7 Sept 2017 5.9-20.9 (Kopylov et al, 2021) Laptev (Müller et al, 2018) 5-80 June-Oct 2012 0.14-5.0 (Sinha et al, 2017) to access scarce carbon sources for growth (Sala et al, 2008). In addition, bacterial communities in the Arctic can adjust their metabolism to the high-latitude cycles of PP (Hop and Wiencke, 2019).…”
Section: Bacterial Cell Size and Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studying the spatial and temporal (on seasonal/interannual timescales) variations of the basal properties of this glacier, Vallot et al [66] pointed out its sliding behavior over an annual scale, primarily driven by changes in the amount of meltwater reaching the bottom. From a 376-day time series of water temperature measurements performed by a LoTUS buoy moored at a depth of 67 m and about 1 km from the calving front of Kronebreen, Holmes et al [67] assessed the dynamics of frontal ablation from August 2016 to September 2017, recording an increasing trend in glacial retreat, an average of 1.03 m/day (396.8 m in the whole study period); these values were comparable to annual retreat values previously reported [66]. Indeed, Kronebreen is considered a fast-moving tidewater glacier with surface speeds of 2-3 m/day; its surface melting results in freshwater runoff that not only freshens fjord waters but also plays a key role in glaciomarine sedimentary processes, transporting sediment material into the fjord [68].…”
Section: Environmental Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%