2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatio-Temporal Updating in the Left Posterior Parietal Cortex

Abstract: Adopting an unusual posture can sometimes give rise to paradoxical experiences. For example, the subjective ordering of successive unseen tactile stimuli delivered to the two arms can be affected when people cross them. A growing body of evidence now highlights the role played by the parietal cortex in spatio-temporal information processing when sensory stimuli are delivered to the body or when actions are executed; however, little is known about the neural basis of such paradoxical feelings resulting from suc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
44
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, as described above, our research group reported that the crossing of one’s arms causes increased BOLD activation in the left PPC9. Taken together, these results suggest that, when activated by arm crossing, the left PPC is responsible for the neural representation of the configuration of body parts.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, as described above, our research group reported that the crossing of one’s arms causes increased BOLD activation in the left PPC9. Taken together, these results suggest that, when activated by arm crossing, the left PPC is responsible for the neural representation of the configuration of body parts.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…The left IPS may also play an important role in the confusion/reversal that is associated with arm crossing during a TOJ task913 and may be responsible for neural representations that overlap with the representation of peripersonal space42. Furthermore, as suggested above, the left IPS may be associated with the self due to its inclusion in the DMN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Because the task requirements have nothing 39 spatial (in theory, the task could be solved by using somatotopic coordinates only), this crossing-40 hand effect compellingly illustrates how the external remapping of touch is automatic in sighted 41 people (Heed and Azañón, 2014). Specific brain networks including parietal and premotor areas 42 have been demonstrated to support this automatic remapping of touch into an external spatial 43 coordinate system (Lloyd et al, 2003;Matsumoto et al, 2004;Azañón et al, 2010a;Takahashi et al, 44 2013; Wada et al, 2012). 45…”
Section: Introduction 27mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Based on the present data, we can hypothesize an involvement of premotor and posterior parietal areas in nociception and pain. These cortical regions have been indeed demonstrated to play a role in coding tactile inputs according to spatiotopic reference frames (Azanon, Longo, Soto-Faraco, & Haggard, 2010;Bolognini & Maravita, 2007;Crollen, Lazzouni, et al, 2017;Lloyd, Shore, Spence, & Calvert, 2003;Takahashi, Kansaku, Wada, Shibuya, & Kitazawa, 2013;Wada et al, 2012) and in participating in crossmodal interactions within peripersonal frames of reference (Avillac, Deneve, Olivier, Pouget, & Duhamel, 2005;Brozzoli, Gentile, Petkova, & Ehrsson, 2011;Graziano et al, 1997;Makin, Holmes, & Zohary, 2007). Premotor and posterior parietal areas have also been shown to be activated by nociceptive and painful stimuli (see review in Apkarian, Bushnell, Treede, & Zubieta, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%