2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatio-temporal variability of the atmospheric boundary layer depth over the Paris agglomeration: An assessment of the impact of the urban heat island intensity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
106
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
9
106
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This efficiency helps obtain significantly improved near-range performance for monitoring shallow NBL. Thus, ceilometers are found to be important candidates, in particular for monitoring the transition from stable boundary layer (SBL) to CBL, or from shallow CBL to a growing CBL regime [50]. On the other hand, due to the high power laser transmitter used in the LiDAR systems, they are suitable for monitoring daytime CBL height with sufficient accuracy as was demonstrated by many researchers in the past.…”
Section: Ceilometer and Lidar Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This efficiency helps obtain significantly improved near-range performance for monitoring shallow NBL. Thus, ceilometers are found to be important candidates, in particular for monitoring the transition from stable boundary layer (SBL) to CBL, or from shallow CBL to a growing CBL regime [50]. On the other hand, due to the high power laser transmitter used in the LiDAR systems, they are suitable for monitoring daytime CBL height with sufficient accuracy as was demonstrated by many researchers in the past.…”
Section: Ceilometer and Lidar Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, while comparing performance of LiDAR and ceilometer, Tsaknakis et al [72] found that during the daytime the CL31 ceilometer was able to correctly detect the presence of various aerosol layers only after averaging the signals for sufficiently longer term period (3 h). An averaging time of more than few tens of minutes is not suitable for determining CBL depths, in particular during the morning transition period, when CBL depth often increases with a growth rate of more than 300 m/h (e.g., [45,50]). …”
Section: Ceilometer and Lidar Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, previous studies demonstrate that the global carbon cycle cannot be predicted exactly by existing atmospheric models [5][6][7]. The natural geographic distribution and temporal variability of CO 2 sources and sinks remain largely uncertain, especially for urbanized areas where high-level sources are located [8,9]. In this case, precise monitoring of atmospheric CO 2 concentration is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%