2020
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiophylogenetic modelling of extinction risk reveals evolutionary distinctiveness and brief flowering period as threats in a hotspot plant genus

Abstract: Comparative models used to predict species threat status can help identify the diagnostic features of species at risk. Such models often combine variables measured at the species level with spatial variables, causing multiple statistical challenges, including phylogenetic and spatial non-independence. We present a novel Bayesian approach for modelling threat status that simultaneously deals with both forms of non-independence and estimates their relative contribution, and we apply the approach to modelling thr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the phylogenetic effect, INLA requires a phylogenetic precision matrix which is the inverse of a phylogenetic covariance matrix. Prior to inverting, the phylogenetic covariance matrix was standardised by dividing by its determinant raised to the power of 1/N species [ 112 ]. To model the spatial effect across the entire landscape, we used a spatial mesh, which was constructed over the point occurrence records and averaged across the spatial random fields of each occurrence record for each species.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the phylogenetic effect, INLA requires a phylogenetic precision matrix which is the inverse of a phylogenetic covariance matrix. Prior to inverting, the phylogenetic covariance matrix was standardised by dividing by its determinant raised to the power of 1/N species [ 112 ]. To model the spatial effect across the entire landscape, we used a spatial mesh, which was constructed over the point occurrence records and averaged across the spatial random fields of each occurrence record for each species.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though not technically threatened, these species provide the most data to correlate with extinction risk. Using a binary threat status variable rather than an ordinal response removes the effects of skewed distributions typical of the ordinal scales used in the IUCN Red List(Dinnage et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatially and spatiotemporally explicit data are increasingly collected in ecology and have the power to reveal new ecological processes (e.g., Dinnage et al . 2020; English et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speed-wise, sdmTMB (and by association VAST) were fastest up to at least 1000 mesh nodes at approximately Spatially and spatiotemporally explicit data are increasingly collected in ecology and have the power to reveal new ecological processes (e.g., Dinnage et al 2020;English et al 2022) and improve ecological management (Sofaer et al 2019). These data present statistical challenges to modelling them effectively and efficiently since appropriate models such as GLMMs with random fields are often computationally intensive and challenging to implement, interpret, and evaluate.…”
Section: Notementioning
confidence: 99%