2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-12053-4_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal Attention Constrained Deep Learning Framework for Dual-Tracer PET Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only temporal features were learned from the TACs and used for separation. There also existed a method separating from the image domain, using both spatial and temporal features [ 28 ]. However, these two types of methods were both influenced by the quality of reconstructed images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Only temporal features were learned from the TACs and used for separation. There also existed a method separating from the image domain, using both spatial and temporal features [ 28 ]. However, these two types of methods were both influenced by the quality of reconstructed images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two kinds of deep learning approaches for dual-tracer reconstruction: the indirect ones and direct ones. Indirect methods firstly reconstruct the dual-tracer dynamic images by traditional reconstruction algorithms, then separate the dual-tracer images by deep neural networks to obtain single-tracer images [24][25][26][27][28]. These networks separate signals either from the voxel time-activity curves (TACs) [24][25][26][27] or from the entire dynamic image [28], and are easily influenced by the quality of reconstructed images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These methods can be divided into two categories. One is the indirect reconstruction methods, which firstly reconstruct the dualtracer images by traditional algorithms, then separate the images by neural networks [26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. The separation can be performed to either the voxel TACs [26][27][28][29][30] or the dynamic image as a whole [31,32], with the latter utilizing the spatial information in addition to the temporal information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to the MTCM method, the supervised DL-based methods (i) separate the mPET signals without explicitly knowing the AIF of each tracer; (ii) have the ability to separate mPET signals using staggered or even simultaneous injection protocols; and (iii) sufficiently reduce the influence of noise in the separation process. DL-based methods for mPET imaging mainly fall into one of two categories: (i) learned post-separation of an mPET reconstruction, such as filtered back projection (FBP) (31,32), maximum likelihood expectation maximisation (MLEM) (32)(33)(34)(35), and alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) (32,34,36,37), (ii) direct-learned mPET image separation from sinogram (38,39). The direct-learned method has also been extended to the separation of simultaneous triple-tracers ([ 11 C] FMZ+[ 11 C]MET+[ 18 F]FDG) PET imaging based on simulated data (40).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%