2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-20215-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of urbanization and its coupling coordination degree in Russia — perspectives from the population, economy, society, and eco-environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weighting of the indicators is determined by the Entropy‐weighting method, which can reduce subjective arbitrariness and errors, and is more scientific and accurate. There are large differences in magnitude and scale between the raw data of different indicators, and there is a lack of comparability between the data, so the raw data need to be standardized for extreme differences (Chu et al, 2022): uitalicij=xitalicijminxj/maxxjminxj,uitalicijis an positive indicator, uitalicij=maxxjxitalicij/maxxjminxj,uitalicijis an inverse indicator, where xitalicij is the raw data of the j indicator in year i , uitalicij is the standardized data of the j indicator in year i , max( x j ), min( x j ) are the maximum and minimum values of the raw data of the j indicator respectively. A larger positive indicator is beneficial to the development of the system, whereas the inverse indicator is the opposite.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The weighting of the indicators is determined by the Entropy‐weighting method, which can reduce subjective arbitrariness and errors, and is more scientific and accurate. There are large differences in magnitude and scale between the raw data of different indicators, and there is a lack of comparability between the data, so the raw data need to be standardized for extreme differences (Chu et al, 2022): uitalicij=xitalicijminxj/maxxjminxj,uitalicijis an positive indicator, uitalicij=maxxjxitalicij/maxxjminxj,uitalicijis an inverse indicator, where xitalicij is the raw data of the j indicator in year i , uitalicij is the standardized data of the j indicator in year i , max( x j ), min( x j ) are the maximum and minimum values of the raw data of the j indicator respectively. A larger positive indicator is beneficial to the development of the system, whereas the inverse indicator is the opposite.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weighting of the indicators is determined by the Entropy-weighting method, which can reduce subjective arbitrariness and errors, and is more scientific and accurate. There are large differences in magnitude and scale between the raw data of different indicators, and there is a lack of comparability between the data, so the raw data need to be standardized for extreme differences (Chu et al, 2022):…”
Section: Coupling Coordination Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of the coupling coordination degree model is that it not only reflects the coupling coordination status among subsystems, but it can also quantify the development level of each subsystem [40]. Determining the indicator weights among systems is important for coupled coordination models, and the main methods are principal component regression [41], geographic and time-weighted regression (GTWR) [42], and the entropy weighting method [43,44]. Principal component regression is mainly applicable to models with a large number of indicators; GTWR considers the spatial geographical location of a study area; and the entropy weighting method is based on the weights obtained from the calculation of the indicator values.…”
Section: Coupled Coordination Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Principal component regression is mainly applicable to models with a large number of indicators; GTWR considers the spatial geographical location of a study area; and the entropy weighting method is based on the weights obtained from the calculation of the indicator values. The coupling coordination degree model has been widely used in the fields of ecological environment and urbanisation [43,45,46], upstream and downstream enterprises of industrial chains [47,48], and land use and transportation development [49,50]. At the same time, scholars have mainly used coupled coordination models to study the interrelationship between traffic accessibility and economic development [51,52].…”
Section: Coupled Coordination Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important factors in determining the urbanization level using the comprehensive indicator method is the selection of indicators. In terms of the construction of the indicator system, the study of building the urbanization indicator system from the four aspects of space, population, economy, and society has a significant impact [ 25 ]. Urbanized systems and natural ecosystems interact in a complex way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%