2018
DOI: 10.1017/s136898001700341x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of malnutrition indicators in children under 5 years of age in Bangladesh, 1999–2011

Abstract: We identified divisions where malnutrition indicators (stunting, underweight and wasting) remain highly clustered and other divisions where they are more widely spread in Bangladesh. This has important implications on how interventions for malnutrition need to be delivered (geographically targeted interventions v. random interventions) within each division of the country.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the selected articles studied more than one type of childhood malnutrition. For subject of the study, 23 articles used children aged under 5 years old as their subject ( n = 23, 85.2%) ( 15 18 , 20 , 21 , 23 25 , 27 39 , 41 ), one study used children aged under 2 years old ( n = 1, 3.7%) ( 19 ), one study used children aged under 3 years old (0–35 months) ( n = 1, 3.7%) ( 26 ), one study used children aged 3 years old–5 years old ( n = 1, 3.7%) ( 40 ) and one study did not mention the age of children used in the study ( n = 1, 3.7%) ( 22 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the selected articles studied more than one type of childhood malnutrition. For subject of the study, 23 articles used children aged under 5 years old as their subject ( n = 23, 85.2%) ( 15 18 , 20 , 21 , 23 25 , 27 39 , 41 ), one study used children aged under 2 years old ( n = 1, 3.7%) ( 19 ), one study used children aged under 3 years old (0–35 months) ( n = 1, 3.7%) ( 26 ), one study used children aged 3 years old–5 years old ( n = 1, 3.7%) ( 40 ) and one study did not mention the age of children used in the study ( n = 1, 3.7%) ( 22 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For information regarding the demographic, socioeconomic status, health and nutrition of the subjects or respondents, most of the articles used data from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) ( n = 15, 55.6%) ( 16 , 19 , 21 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 30 , 31 , 33 , 35 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ), four studies used data from National Family Health Survey (NFHS) ( n = 4, 14.8%) ( 15 , 17 , 22 , 37 ), two studies obtained data from Food Security and Nutrition Unit (FSNAU) ( n = 2, 7.4%) ( 29 , 32 ), two studied from National Nutritional Survey (NNS) ( n = 2, 7.4%) ( 20 , 34 ), two studies from Nutritional Status Information System (NSIS) ( n = 2, 7.4%) ( 25 , 28 ), one study from Feed the Future Survey (FTF) ( n = 1, 3.7%) ( 18 ), one study from Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) ( n = 1, 3.7%) ( 24 ), one study from Core Welfare Indicators Questionnaire (CWIQ) ( n = 1, 3.7%) ( 24 ) and one study conducted their own survey to obtain the data ( n = 1, 3.7%) ( 27 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations