2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00702-009-0220-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal integration of sensory stimuli in complex regional pain syndrome and dystonia

Abstract: The aetiology of dystonia in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS-I) is incompletely understood. In primary dystonia, somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) after spatially or temporally separated stimulation revealed impaired central sensory integration. Information on somatosensory processing in dystonia in CRPS-I patients may provide better insight into the underlying pathophysiological mechanism. We studied SSEPs in 33 patients with CRPS-I and dystonia and 19 healthy controls. N9, N14, N20 and N35 amplitud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some MEG studies did show a stronger response in S1 to stimulation of the affected compared to the unaffected hand (16). In comparison to healthy controls, no differences were reported so far (14, 16, 17). In summary, if at all, only small changes in amplitude and topographical representation can be expected in CRPS patient’s sensorimotor cortex when comparing affected and non-affected hemisphere responses to tactile stimulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, some MEG studies did show a stronger response in S1 to stimulation of the affected compared to the unaffected hand (16). In comparison to healthy controls, no differences were reported so far (14, 16, 17). In summary, if at all, only small changes in amplitude and topographical representation can be expected in CRPS patient’s sensorimotor cortex when comparing affected and non-affected hemisphere responses to tactile stimulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Contralateral spread is twice as likely as ipsilateral, and diagonal spread is rather rare (17). There is a strong body of evidence showing changed functional organization of the primary sensory cortex associated with CRPS [reviewed in Ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Van Rijn et al 22 found no differences in somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) in CRPS-1 patients with dystonia compared to healthy controls after spatio-temporal stimulation (confirming the integrity of “cortical proprioceptive afferent processing”). In relation to our case report, we would like to highlight the role of small nerve fibers in CRPS (C and Aδ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Oaklander and colleagues (2009) hypothesised that these dystonias could be caused by small and large fibre neuropathies. However, sensory integration of proprioceptive afferent input has been found to be normal (Van Rijn et al 2009) thus ruling out large nerve fibre involvement. More recent work by Munts and colleagues (2011) suggests that dystonias in CRPS arise from problems in peripheral control of muscle force.…”
Section: Motor Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%