2017
DOI: 10.3354/meps12019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal modelling of marine movement data using Template Model Builder (TMB)

Abstract: Tracking of marine animals has increased exponentially in the past decade, and the resulting data could lead to an in-depth understanding of the causes and consequences of movement in the ocean. However, most common marine tracking systems are associated with large measurement errors. Accounting for these errors requires the use of hierarchical models, which are often difficult to fit to data. Using 3 case studies, we demonstrate that Template Model Builder (TMB), a new R package, is an accurate, efficient and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
94
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing Bayesian and TMB versions of a location‐filtering model, Auger‐Méthé et al. () found a 30‐fold decrease in computation time for the TMB fit with no loss of accuracy. All code for fitting these models in R is available online ,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing Bayesian and TMB versions of a location‐filtering model, Auger‐Méthé et al. () found a 30‐fold decrease in computation time for the TMB fit with no loss of accuracy. All code for fitting these models in R is available online ,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irregular observations are often handled in the observation equation in a state-space model; however, with GPS data, we can typically assume negligible observation error and save considerable model complexity by modeling the observations directly with the movement equation (Patterson et al, 2008, 2017; Hooten et al, 2017). Notably, parameterizing a CRW in terms of displacement vectors allows for straightforward relationships with time without an observation equation (Auger-Méthé et al, 2017; Gurarie et al, 2017; Eisaguirre et al, 2019; Jonsen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for behavioral heterogeneity, its predictors, and irregular observations, we implemented our SSF with the following movement model representing ϕ ( · ) (Auger-Méthé et al, 2017; Eisaguirre et al, 2019; Jonsen et al, 2019): Where Here, Δ t i = t i − t i− 1 represents the time interval between Cartesian coordinate vectors x i and x i− 1 for the observed locations of the animal at times t i and t i− 1 , and i = 1, 2, …, N for a track with N observations. Note that the movement parameters in equation 1 are θ i = ( γ i , Σ i ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of large data sets for each species with ARGOS data and computational limitations restricting the fit of one large hierarchical SSM per species, we grouped ~20 individuals per species per model run. Models were run in r v. 3.3.2 (R Development Core Team, ) and jags v 4.2.0 (Plummer, ) using bsam v. 1.1.1 (Jonsen, ) for ARGOS data and in TMB v. 1.7.4 (Kristensen, Nielsen, Berg, Skaug, & Bell, ) for GLS data using modified code (Auger‐Méthé et al., ). In bsam , two Markov chain Monte Carlo chains were run for 40,000 iterations with a 20,000‐sample burn‐in and thinned every 20 samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%