2018
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggy506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal noise in GPS position time-series from Crustal Movement Observation Network of China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the WN version has the highest SNRs for each component, and the Filtered version has the higher SNRs than the Unfiltered version, detailed in Table 3. If the average of SNR is taken as an indicator to evaluate the influence of CME and noise model on the velocity estimation, the averaged SNR of the WN version is about 10 dB larger than that of the Unfiltered version, while that of the Filtered version is about 5 dB larger than the Unfiltered version; it is not surprising that the WN version has the largest SNRs since velocity uncertainties have been found underestimated 8-10 times in previous studies [42,43]. As suggested by these studies, it is not proper to estimate the velocity field just based on WN only model and the coloured noise should be considered.…”
Section: The Influence Of Cme and Noise Model On The Estimation Of Cr...mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, the WN version has the highest SNRs for each component, and the Filtered version has the higher SNRs than the Unfiltered version, detailed in Table 3. If the average of SNR is taken as an indicator to evaluate the influence of CME and noise model on the velocity estimation, the averaged SNR of the WN version is about 10 dB larger than that of the Unfiltered version, while that of the Filtered version is about 5 dB larger than the Unfiltered version; it is not surprising that the WN version has the largest SNRs since velocity uncertainties have been found underestimated 8-10 times in previous studies [42,43]. As suggested by these studies, it is not proper to estimate the velocity field just based on WN only model and the coloured noise should be considered.…”
Section: The Influence Of Cme and Noise Model On The Estimation Of Cr...mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Some signals cause spatial responses to change smoothly with obvious boundaries between positive and negative responses, such as IC5, IC7 and IC8 of the east component; IC1, IC4, IC5 and IC10 of the up component. These signals may be related to some seasonal and geographic factors, such as monument types and thermal expansions [42]. Some signals have strong responses in local areas, especially in the up component, such as the Tianshan region and Sichuan-Yunnan region (circled by dotted lines) in IC3, the Tianshan region and the southeastern costal region in IC6, and North China block and South China block regions in IC9.…”
Section: Cme Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 7f shows an oscillation with a period of approximately one year. As we have removed the signal with a period of one yr from the GPS time series by using the least squares method before employing PCA, and Figure 7g shows that the frequency of this signal is approximately 1.03 cpy, we suggest that a potential interpretation of this frequency is attributed to the GPS draconic error related to the satellite orbit [36][37][38][39]. Figure 7f also clearly shows a signal with a period of ~6 yr, and the corresponding Fourier spectrum in Figure 7e also confirms this finding.…”
Section: Wavelet and Fourier Spectra Of Common Mode Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GPS time series may contain seasonal, interannual, unmodeled signals, and noises, which may be explained by functional and stochastic noise models [39]. Therefore, a stochastic model that accounts for temporal correlations in the GPS time series should be incorporated to identify realistic geophysical information.…”
Section: Nonlinear Signals Of An Unmodeled Cmcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining stations are expressed as band pass+powerlaw noise (BPPL) and first-order Gauss-Markov+random walk noise (FOGMRW). In 2019, Wang et al [21] analyzed the coordinate time series of 260 continuous GPS stations in the Crustal Movement Observation Network of China (CMONOC). In the noise evaluation, the influence of periodic signals is considered, and the maximum likelihood estimation method is used to discuss the noise characteristics of the residual time series that remove seasonal signals and the coordinate time series that further remove other periodic signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%