2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal patterns of recent PM2.5 concentrations over typical urban agglomerations in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 ). A stable vertical atmospheric structure weakens the atmospheric turbulent exchange and hinders the diffusion of air pollutants in the vertical direction ( Shen et al., 2018 ; Zhang et al., 2013 ). There was no significant difference in wind speed between the two heavy pollution periods in Beijing and Tianjin, while the wind speed increased by 41% during the second episode compared with the first episode ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 ). A stable vertical atmospheric structure weakens the atmospheric turbulent exchange and hinders the diffusion of air pollutants in the vertical direction ( Shen et al., 2018 ; Zhang et al., 2013 ). There was no significant difference in wind speed between the two heavy pollution periods in Beijing and Tianjin, while the wind speed increased by 41% during the second episode compared with the first episode ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Moran's I of PM 2.5 concentration in CPEZ is about 0.08-0.19, which reveals an autocorrelation of PM 2.5 concentration in the region. However, Moran's I of PM 2.5 concentration in CPEZ is relatively lower compared with the three major economic growth areas (BTH, YRD, and PRD), which is about 0.4 to 0.9 [42][43][44]. There are two possible reasons for this situation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Combined with the results in Figure 2, PM 2.5 and PM 10 were the main factors of the AECC overload in Xinjiang. However, the high PM 2.5 and PM 10 levels in Xinjiang were the result of natural factors, such as drought, low rain amounts, sparse vegetation, the extensive Gobi Desert and more wind [48][49][50], with human activities having a lower impact [51,52]. At the same time, some environmental experts in Xinjiang have pointed out that the monitoring data on PM 2.5 and PM 10 in Xinjiang are too high to truly evaluate the air quality of arid regions [53][54][55].…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%