Spatiotemporal Patterns of Wolves, and Sympatric Predators and Prey Relative to Human Disturbance in Northwestern Greece

Abstract

In an era of increasing human pressure on nature, understanding the spatiotemporal patterns of wildlife relative to human disturbance can inform conservation efforts, especially for large carnivores. We examined the temporal activity and spatial patterns of wolves and eight sympatric mammals at 71 camera trap stations in Greece. Grey wolves temporally overlapped the most with wild boars (Δ = 0.84) and medium-sized mammals (Δ > 0.75), moderately with brown bears (Δ = 0.70), and least with roe deer (Δ = 0.46). All wild mammals were mainly nocturnal and exhibited low temporal overlap with human disturbance (humans, vehicles, livestock, and dogs; Δ = 0.18–0.36), apart from roe deer, which were more diurnal (Δ = 0.80). Six out of nine species increased their nocturnality at sites of high human disturbance, particularly roe deer and wolves. The detection of wolves was negatively associated with paved roads, the detection of roe deer was negatively associated with human disturbance, and the detection of wild boars was negatively associated with dogs. The detection of bears, boars, and foxes increased closer to settlements. Our study has applied implications for wolf conservation and human–wildlife coexistence.

Non‐exploitative human disturbance provides shelter for prey from predator

“…Human presence can also influence predator–prey interaction by altering their diel activity patterns (Petridou et al, 2023 ). Analysis of activity patterns revealed that prey species showed high temporal overlap with humans, whereas there was little overlap in the activity of predators with that of humans.…”

Application of remote sensing methods for monitoring wild life populations: a review

“…It is a very suitable method for studying the behavior of large mammals [22][23][24] . The method turns out to be very effective for research as well as for comparison of diurnal activity of multiple species in a certain area [25][26][27] .…”

Do recolonising wolves trigger non-consumptive effects in European ecosystems? A review of evidence

“…However, shifts in the wolves' space use or other factors could have influenced this effect. In Moldavia and Greece high temporal overlap of wolves and roe deer was found, however roe deer activity peaked when wolf activity decreased (Popova et al, 2018, Petridou et al, 2023. In a study looking at activity synchronisation between wolves and moose in Norway, moose activity peaked at dusk, whereas the wolves' activity peaked at dawn (Eriksen et al, 2011).…”