2015
DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal resource partitioning of water sources by African carnivores on Namibian commercial farmlands

Abstract: Interspecific competition often occurs when sympatric carnivores compete for the same, limited resources, although the degree of competition between species pairs may vary with biotic factors such as body-size, diet and population density. Avoidance of dominant competitors along the axes of space and time is a potential mechanism for reducing chances of direct encounters between species. However, when resources are essential and spatially fixed, options for spatial partitioning may be limited. We examined reso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Carnivore camera trap images were identified and classed into independent events as described in Edwards et al (2015). Whilst an occupancy approach may have been more suitable for such a study, the low samples sizes of some carnivore species meant models showed a poor fit to the data, therefore a comparison of relative abundance indices was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Carnivore camera trap images were identified and classed into independent events as described in Edwards et al (2015). Whilst an occupancy approach may have been more suitable for such a study, the low samples sizes of some carnivore species meant models showed a poor fit to the data, therefore a comparison of relative abundance indices was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst an occupancy approach may have been more suitable for such a study, the low samples sizes of some carnivore species meant models showed a poor fit to the data, therefore a comparison of relative abundance indices was used. Relative abundance indices for each species were calculated (Edwards et al, 2015), and were viewed as analogous to detection probabilities following Harmsen et al (2010) and Mann et al (2014). Mann-Whitney U tests were used to test for significant differences between detection probabilities produced by the water source survey design and the road survey design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Species habitat preferences can be altered depending on the level of perceived risk, including from larger predators. For example, in Tanzania, cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) favour heterogeneous habitats that provide refuges, allowing cheetahs to actively alter their spatio-temporal use of the landscape in response to changing densities of larger predators (Durant 1998;Edwards et al 2015). At lower densities of larger predators, cheetahs avoided lions (Panthera leo) at a fine scale, but not hyenas (Crocuta crocuta), in contrast, at higher densities, cheetahs avoided both lions and hyenas (Durant 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%