2020
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.3702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal variations and driving factors of the potential wind erosion rate in the Hexi region, PR China

Abstract: To reduce the damage caused by wind erosion, the accurate evaluation of wind erosion dynamics and revelation of their driving mechanism are crucial. In this study, the revised wind erosion equation was applied for the estimation of the potential wind erosion rate (PWER) from 1982 to 2015 in the Hexi region, China. Geographic detection, variable control, and correlation analysis were used to determine the contributions of climatic factors and land use patterns to wind erosion. The results showed that the PWER d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shrubs desert zone (LS2) and the herbal desert zone (LS3) are the highest at both depths regarding the sand fraction and the lowest at both depths regarding the clay and silt fraction; this may be because, in reality, the low vegetation coverage of LS2 and LS3 (about <6%) and the relatively low level of evaporation lead to the formation of loose surface sediments, with a small amount of salt accumulating near to the surface (Figure 8). Wind erosion is more serious in the clay and silt fraction, which is prone to erosion, which causes corresponding content reduction and leads sediment surfaces to become much rougher over a long period of wind erosion [60].…”
Section: Discussion On the Grain Size Characteristics Of Sediments Found In Typical Landscapes And Its Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shrubs desert zone (LS2) and the herbal desert zone (LS3) are the highest at both depths regarding the sand fraction and the lowest at both depths regarding the clay and silt fraction; this may be because, in reality, the low vegetation coverage of LS2 and LS3 (about <6%) and the relatively low level of evaporation lead to the formation of loose surface sediments, with a small amount of salt accumulating near to the surface (Figure 8). Wind erosion is more serious in the clay and silt fraction, which is prone to erosion, which causes corresponding content reduction and leads sediment surfaces to become much rougher over a long period of wind erosion [60].…”
Section: Discussion On the Grain Size Characteristics Of Sediments Found In Typical Landscapes And Its Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published wind erosion data have also been used to verify wind erosion models (e.g., Wang et al, 2020;Zhou et al, 2020). Nevertheless, many studies have directly assessed regional wind erosion, but no calibration or verification of the wind erosion models were conducted (e.g., Feng and Sharratt, 2005;Guo et al, 2013;Borrelli et al, 2017;Fenta et al, 2020;Lin et al, 2020). Our study indicates that the type of wind data has a significant influence on the potential wind erosion estimation obtained using the RWEQ and IWEMS.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The influences of historical climate changes on wind erosion have been extensively studied. The variations in the historical wind speed, precipitation, and temperature have generally been summarized as the main factors affecting temporal wind erosion trends (e.g., Haiyan Zhang et al, 2018;Edwards et al, 2019;Lin et al, 2020). Recently, the effects of future climate change scenarios on wind erosion have also been explored.…”
Section: Implications For the Impacts Of Climate Change On Wind Erosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is a function of vegetation ecosystems whereby sand is restrained and fixed in the process of wind erosion (Cui, Wang, Zhang, Tang, & Dai, 2020; W. Wang, Li, & Ren, 2017; J. Xu, Xiao, Xie, Wang & Jiang, 2018). In recent years, researchers have been deepening their understanding of the SFS and have done a lot of work in terms of evaluating the SFS and its driving mechanism (Lin et al, 2021; Mendez & Buschiazzo, 2010; Pi & Sharratt, 2017; H. Zhang et al, 2018; Zhou, Zhang, Zou, Zhang, & Zhang, 2020). In most studies, the revised wind erosion equation is used to calculate soil wind erosion in the absence of vegetation and the real conditions, and the sand fixation amount and retention rate are used as quantitative indexes to evaluate the SFS (Borrelli et al, 2017; Garbrecht, Nearing, Steiner, Zhang, & Nichols, 2015; Sharratt, Tatarko, Abatzoglou, Fox, & Huggins, 2015; H. Wang, Sun, Yu, Xin, & Jia, 2020; B. Xie, Jia, Qin, Jian, & Chang, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%