1998
DOI: 10.1049/el:19980126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speaker identification through use of features selectedusing genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such methods include feature selection, feature transformation, and novel speech representations alternative to a spectral representation. By feature selection, one attempts to discover a subset of features likely carrying speaker-specific information (less associated with linguistic information reciprocally) from a common spectral representation [19], [24], [34]. Apart from some text-dependent cases [24], [34], however, most such fail to generate a proper subset due to the lack of an appropriate mathematical expression methodology [5] and numberless varieties of speaker-specific information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such methods include feature selection, feature transformation, and novel speech representations alternative to a spectral representation. By feature selection, one attempts to discover a subset of features likely carrying speaker-specific information (less associated with linguistic information reciprocally) from a common spectral representation [19], [24], [34]. Apart from some text-dependent cases [24], [34], however, most such fail to generate a proper subset due to the lack of an appropriate mathematical expression methodology [5] and numberless varieties of speaker-specific information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ganchev [39][40][41][42][43] proposed PNN with Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients for textindependence. Although there are numerous enhanced versions of the original PNN presented by many researchers, which are either more economical or exhibit an appreciably better performance for simplicity of exposition, we adopted and invoked the original PNN for classification task (see Fig.…”
Section: Proposed Probabilistic Neural Network Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these techniques are unsuitable for speaker identification because they accept stationary signal within a given time frame and may therefore lack the ability to analyze the nonstationary signals or signals in transient state (Avci & Akpolat, 2006). Therefore, many algorithms were developed to find a better representation of a speaker, for example: linear predictive coding (LPC) technique (Adami & Barone, 2001;Haydar, Demirekler, & Yurtseven, 1998;Wutiwiwatchai, Achariyakulporn, & Tanprasert, 1999), Mel frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) (Mashao & Skosan, 2006;Sroka & Braida, 2005) and wavelet (Lung, 2006;Wu & Lin, 2009;Wu & Ye, 2009). In this paper, an improved method based on LPC is proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%