2016 IEEE Congreso Argentino De Ciencias De La Informática Y Desarrollos De Investigación (CACIDI) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cacidi.2016.7785985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speaker-independent embedded speech recognition using Hidden Markov Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, artificial intelligence (AI) has been used in numerous fields of the latest studies. Previously, speech recognition studies utilizing ML achieved a high degree of precision by using the Gaussian mixture model (GMM) technique ( Marufo da Silva, Evin & Verrastro, 2016 ; Maghsoodi et al, 2019 ; Mouaz, Abderrahim & Abdelmajid, 2019 ), and the hidden Markov model (HMM) technique ( Veena & Mathew, 2015 ; Bao & Shen, 2016 ; Chakroun et al, 2016 ; Maurya, Kumar & Agarwal, 2018 ). However, as the data increases, the level of accuracy with these techniques drops rapidly, to the point where these traditional ML approaches suffer from low accuracy and generalization issues ( Xie et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, artificial intelligence (AI) has been used in numerous fields of the latest studies. Previously, speech recognition studies utilizing ML achieved a high degree of precision by using the Gaussian mixture model (GMM) technique ( Marufo da Silva, Evin & Verrastro, 2016 ; Maghsoodi et al, 2019 ; Mouaz, Abderrahim & Abdelmajid, 2019 ), and the hidden Markov model (HMM) technique ( Veena & Mathew, 2015 ; Bao & Shen, 2016 ; Chakroun et al, 2016 ; Maurya, Kumar & Agarwal, 2018 ). However, as the data increases, the level of accuracy with these techniques drops rapidly, to the point where these traditional ML approaches suffer from low accuracy and generalization issues ( Xie et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%