The Handbook of Speech Perception 2021
DOI: 10.1002/9781119184096.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speaker Normalization in Speech Perception

Abstract: Acoustic-phonetic analysis of speech, made practical by the advent of the speech spectrograph (Koenig, Dunn & Lacy, 1946), prompted a number of foundational questions regarding the perception of speech because spectrograms showed that speech is highly variable both within and between talkers. Among early researchers, Liberman et al. (1967) focussed on within-talker variation in the acoustic cues for stop place of articulation, while others focussed on between-talker variation in the acoustic cues for vowels. "… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 185 publications
3
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar perspective arises from studies of speech perception. The proposal that we retain significant amounts of verbatim language is in line with the central tenet of episodic theory wherein episodic details (phonetic and vocal information) of what we hear are encoded in memory (Hintzman, 1986;Goldinger, 1996;Johnson, 1997Johnson, , 2006Mitterer and Reinisch, 2017).…”
Section: Verbatim Memory For Languagesupporting
confidence: 55%
“…A similar perspective arises from studies of speech perception. The proposal that we retain significant amounts of verbatim language is in line with the central tenet of episodic theory wherein episodic details (phonetic and vocal information) of what we hear are encoded in memory (Hintzman, 1986;Goldinger, 1996;Johnson, 1997Johnson, , 2006Mitterer and Reinisch, 2017).…”
Section: Verbatim Memory For Languagesupporting
confidence: 55%
“…On this view, conventional patients would experience a different and better voice quality than SSD-CI patients. On the other hand, a normal cortical representation of speech may serve as a reference from which the electrical representation can be normalized (e.g., Johnson, 2005). On this view, conventional patients, who lack a temporally immediate reference, would experience a poorer voice quality than SSD-CI patients.…”
Section: What Is Missing From the Approximations?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we dismiss the Chomskyan UG hypothesis and the universal set of distinctive features it contains (in the Hale and Reiss, 2008 view) the structures (syntactic categories, morphosyntactic structure, syllable structure and the internal structure of sounds) that we observe on the basis of linguistic evidence have to come from somewhere else. The typical answer provided by those who reject the innatist view, is that it comes from, or emerges from, language usage rather than being part of UG (Johnson, 1997;Bybee, 2006;van de Weijer, 2014;Van de Weijer, 2017;Archangeli and Pulleyblank, 2015;and many others). Although there are a lot of different usage-based approaches to language, such as, among others, Construction Grammar (cf.…”
Section: Where Does Structure Come From?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are a lot of different usage-based approaches to language, such as, among others, Construction Grammar (cf. for instance Tomasello, 2003;Goldberg, 2006) and Exemplar-Theory (cf., among others, Johnson, 1997;Pierrehumbert, 2001), they all share the assumption that there is no innate universal grammar, but that instead, grammatical knowledge emerges in usage. It would be far beyond the scope of the present paper to give a comprehensive overview of the different approaches.…”
Section: Where Does Structure Come From?mentioning
confidence: 99%