2011
DOI: 10.1017/s1743923x1100033x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speaking for the Underrepresented in the House of Representatives: Voicing Women's Interests in a Partisan Era

Abstract: We ask whether women's descriptive representation in Congress enhances women's substantive representation through speechmaking on the House floor. Much of the research on women's substantive representation has focused on members' votes for and sponsorship of “women's issues” legislation. We depart from this research by systematically analyzing how members' gender and partisan identities affect gendered rhetoric in their floor speeches. In an era marked by significant increases in the number of congresswomen an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have reviewed work examining the behavior of citizens and elites, but social role theory could also be extended to studying the behavior of men and women elected to office. There are numerous studies that demonstrate that male and female lawmakers differ in their legislative approaches and outputs (e.g., Anzia & Berry, ; Frederick, ; Lazarus & Steigerwalt, ; Pearson & Dancey, ; Swers, ; Volden et al, , to name a few). A political psychology approach could extend this research by examining the extent to which male and female politicians conform to or deviate from their gender roles once elected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have reviewed work examining the behavior of citizens and elites, but social role theory could also be extended to studying the behavior of men and women elected to office. There are numerous studies that demonstrate that male and female lawmakers differ in their legislative approaches and outputs (e.g., Anzia & Berry, ; Frederick, ; Lazarus & Steigerwalt, ; Pearson & Dancey, ; Swers, ; Volden et al, , to name a few). A political psychology approach could extend this research by examining the extent to which male and female politicians conform to or deviate from their gender roles once elected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, women's ability to occupy formal positions of power does not easily follow from women's rising numbers in a decision-making group. This disparity is partly the result of partisan differences in women's representation: at both the state and national level, the gender gap in women's representation is much greater in the Republican Party than in the Democratic Party (Carroll & Sanbonmatsu, 2013;Pearson & Dancey, 2011b;Sanbonmatsu, 2002;Wolbrecht, 2000). So when Republicans hold power, as they do in the current Congress, an especially large gender disparity in leadership positions may be expected.…”
Section: Women's Influence In American Political Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Pearson and Dancey (2011b) find evidence that among both Democrats and Republicans, women literally speak differently from men, raising the needs of women much more often when they give speeches on the floor of the House (see also Hall, 1996; but see Gerrity et al, 2007). Similarly, Osborn and Mendez (2010) show that female senators are more likely than their male counterparts to make floor speeches about issues of direct relevance to women, such as family and women's health.…”
Section: Women's Influence In American Political Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Women are also more likely to vote for stricter laws related to gender violence like laws on domestic abuse, sexual assault and rape, and on foreign women's rights policies (Childs 2006;Swers 2006). 6 Women legislators across parties are more likely to discuss women's interests in floor debates (K. Pearson and Dancey 2011). Women legislators also tend to vote more as a block when it comes to these issues (Swers 1998(Swers , 2002Dolan 1997).…”
Section: Women Legislators and Humanitarian Military Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%