2017
DOI: 10.1177/0265532217734240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speaking proficiency of young language students: A discourse-analytic study

Abstract: This study investigated a range of fluency, grammar, vocabulary, and content features of young language students’ speaking performances, using a discourse-analytic approach. In total, 179 test takers’ responses to the speaking section of the TOEFL Junior® Comprehensive test were selected for analysis. Mixed-design ANOVAs were used to compare 21 spoken discourse features across four proficiency levels and two task types (i.e., a picture narration task and an integrated listen/speak task). The discourse features… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between this research and other types of research is that this methodology is not directly related to objects under study, but accesses information from various literature to form a relationship. Yuan mentioned that this research accesses and processes information contained in the literature from various places and perspectives, so the researcher tends to use logical reasons to explore logical relationships between objects [8].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between this research and other types of research is that this methodology is not directly related to objects under study, but accesses information from various literature to form a relationship. Yuan mentioned that this research accesses and processes information contained in the literature from various places and perspectives, so the researcher tends to use logical reasons to explore logical relationships between objects [8].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the role of oral language production in second language learning contexts, oral language facilitates second language learning in important ways, such as providing learners with the opportunities to compare their own production to the target language, to test how the language works (Hasselgreen & Caudwell, 2016;Swain, 1997). Oral language is also an important precursor to literacy in YLLs and this connection holds true in second language acquisition contexts as well (August & Shanahan, 2006).…”
Section: Ylls' Oral Language Proficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of these commercial EFL proficiency tests, such as the Cambridge Young Learners English Test, target students between 5 and 12 years of age. EFL proficiency tests for adolescent learners are relatively few in number, and published research on these tests is limited compared to tests for adults (Hsieh & Wang, 2019;Papageorgiou & Cho, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…reading, listening, and writing). Nonetheless, with the exception of a recent study by Hsieh and Wang (2019), research on integrated tasks has primarily focused on their use in adult L2-learner contexts (see e.g. Frost, Elder, & Wigglesworth, 2011;Plakans, Gebril, & Bilki, 2016).…”
Section: Affective Reactions In Computer-mediated Testing Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%