1987
DOI: 10.1121/1.395283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speaking rate of adventitiously deaf male cochlear implant candidates

Abstract: No objective group data on speaking rate or speaking duration have been reported on the speech of adventitiously profoundly hearing-impaired adults. Results of the present study showed that speaking rate, i.e., number of syllables per second, was significantly slower and speaking duration was significantly longer for 25 adventitiously profoundly hearing-impaired adult male cochlear implant candidates than for 10 normal-hearing control subjects. The factors of length of time since onset of profound hearing loss… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most distinctive characteristics of deaf speech is its reduced rate of articulation. Reduced speaking rates have been found in deaf individuals prior to the availability of cochlear implants (Nickerson, 1975), as well as in cochlear implant users (Leder et al, 1987). These results suggest that overt speaking rate and subvocal verbal rehearsal speed could be responsible for the shorter immediate memory spans observed in deaf children with cochlear implants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…One of the most distinctive characteristics of deaf speech is its reduced rate of articulation. Reduced speaking rates have been found in deaf individuals prior to the availability of cochlear implants (Nickerson, 1975), as well as in cochlear implant users (Leder et al, 1987). These results suggest that overt speaking rate and subvocal verbal rehearsal speed could be responsible for the shorter immediate memory spans observed in deaf children with cochlear implants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Also shown ͑row 7͒ are studies of the intelligibility of speech produced under these conditions. Picheny et al, 1986Bond et al, 1989Lane et al, 1995͑CI, NF2͒ Clark et al, 1987Leder et al, 1987bDreher and O'Neil, 1958Leder and Spitzer, 1990Hanley and Steer, 1949Perkell et al, 1992͑CI͒ Lane et al, 1970Svirsky et al, 1992͑CI͒ Tartter et al, 1993Van Summers et al, 1988Webster and Klumpp, 1962͑2͒ F0 Picheny et al, 1986Bond et al, 1989Binnie et al, 1982Schulman, 1989Clark et al, 1987Lane et al, 1995͑CI, NF2͒ Van Summers et al, 1988Leder and Spitzer, 1993Leder et al, 1987Oster, 1987Perkell et al, 1992͑CI͒ Plant, 1984Svirsky et al, 1992 ͑3͒ Duration ͑word or segment͒ Cutler and Butterfield, 1990Clark et al, 1987Binnie et al, 1982Lindblom, 1990Dreher and O'Neil, 1958Lane and Webster, 1991Moon and Lindblom, 1989Hanley and Steer, 1949Leder et al, 1987aPicheny et al, 1986Tartter et al, 1993Leder and Spitzer, 1990Schulman, 1989Van Summers et al, 1988Perkell et al, 1992…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, sequential organization of speech can be disrupted such that syllables are inappropriately dropped, repeated, or substituted one for another. Moreover, the temporal pattern of speech may be further altered by speeding up or slowing down, by an increase in the duration of pauses between syllables and by inappropriate voicing during normally silent periods (Penn, 1955;Kirk and Edgerton, 1983;Leder et al, 1987b;Lane and Webster, 1991;Cowie and Douglas-Cowie, 1992). …”
Section: The Nature Of Deafening-induced Changes To Songmentioning
confidence: 99%