Speaking truth through power: Conceptualizing internal whistleblowing hotlines with Foucault’s dispositive

Abstract

This article is an examination of the various ambivalences, limitations and dilemmas that are associated with the internal whistleblowing hotline – which is conceptualized as a management technique that strives to contain, codify, constrain, standardize, and neutralize acts of speaking up against illegal or unethical practices. In other words the interest is on what happens when the critical practice of whistleblowing or ‘speaking truth to power’ is sought institutionalized and transformed into a practice of ‘speaking truth through power’ – that is, through the managerial instrument of the whistleblowing hotline. The article argues that the Foucauldian concept of dispositive can help explain how a seemingly expedient and pragmatic technique such as the whistleblowing hotline, is in fact riddled with complexity and contradiction, which in turn creates a series of dilemmas and limitations related to aim and function the hotline. The analysis thus shows how the internal whistleblowing hotline can take different forms depending on the dispositive permeating it. Empirically, the analysis is based on descriptions of the use and function of internal whistleblowing hotlines in a Danish context.

The Selection of the Chair of the Whistleblowers Protection Office in Slovakia as the Creation of State-Institutionalised Ethical-Political Agency

“…Klasické pojetí whistleblowingu Ralpha Nadera z počátku sedmdesátých let 20. století vycházelo z inherentního konfliktu mezi soukromými organizacemi a společností [Nader, Petkas, Blackwell 1972]. Koncem devadesátých let 20. století byl ale whistleblowing stále více rámován jako nástroj managementu, který činí organizace efektivnější, což zneviditelnilo jeho politický a demokratizační potenciál [Du Plessis 2020].…”

Genealogy on Policies and Strategies of Physical Education for Elementary Schools in Indonesia

“…Such an understanding would position the construction of physical education in elementary schools within a historical context. However, the history referred to here is not in the general sense, but rather a genealogical history within the Foucauldian framework (Dreyfus & Rabinow, 2014).…”

Goodbye Foucault’s ‘missing human agent’? Self-formation, capability and the dispositifs

“…The intention in this article, however, is not so much to refute the long-standing critical consensus but rather to reconstruct an analytical approach from Foucault’s work, which allows space for considering ‘human agency’, including individuals’ pursuit of tactics, attempts at solving problems, reactions to unexpected events and reconstructive work on their own subjectivities. Specifically, I will present an analytical approach by drawing upon Foucault’s concept of the dispositif , which, at the moment, is receiving growing attention in empirical applications of Foucauldian analysis (du Plessis, 2020; Fleming et al, 2022; Gøtzsche-Astrup, 2022; Hautz and Thoma, 2021; Wagner et al, 2021; Villadsen, 2021).…”