2006
DOI: 10.29242/spec.292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPEC Kit 292: Institutional Repositories (July 2006)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the total of IR investigated by Rieh et al (2007), only 19.4% held more than 5 thousand documents. The authors consider these rates low, but stated these results are in accordance with those of previous researchers, such as Lynch & Lippincott (2005), Shearer (2004), andBailey Jr. et al (2006). The disparity between the reality found in this study and the reports of the North American reality should be taken with relativity, given the time distance between the two analyses.…”
Section: Size Of the Irsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Of the total of IR investigated by Rieh et al (2007), only 19.4% held more than 5 thousand documents. The authors consider these rates low, but stated these results are in accordance with those of previous researchers, such as Lynch & Lippincott (2005), Shearer (2004), andBailey Jr. et al (2006). The disparity between the reality found in this study and the reports of the North American reality should be taken with relativity, given the time distance between the two analyses.…”
Section: Size Of the Irsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Several other projects report on the state of IRs in the United States, including a survey of the Association of Research Libraries' member institutions (Bailey et al, 2006), which naturally focused on research-level institutions. and Library Services, released a census of institutional repositories in the United States as well (Markey, Rich, St. Jean, Kim, & Yakel, 2007).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2006 a survey conducted by the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) found that the majority of repositories of ARL members were run by library units (Bailey, 2006). In 2007 respondents to the MIRACLE census of institutional repositories in the United States included almost 75% library directors, followed by 10.2% library staff and 7.9% assistant/associate librarians (Markey et al, 2007, section 2.1).…”
Section: Institutional Repositories In Academic Librariesmentioning
confidence: 99%