2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Special endpoint and product specific considerations in pharmaceutical acceptable daily exposure derivation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike donkey skin-made CCA, the efficacy and safety of which have been tested in human trials for over 2,000 years, the gelatin made from other animal species may cause severe problems. 7 On the one hand, it could possess little to no effect compared to the authentic products. On the other hand, infectious risks are associated with some animal species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike donkey skin-made CCA, the efficacy and safety of which have been tested in human trials for over 2,000 years, the gelatin made from other animal species may cause severe problems. 7 On the one hand, it could possess little to no effect compared to the authentic products. On the other hand, infectious risks are associated with some animal species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For illustrative purposes, Table 1 presents a typical pharmaceutical compound banding system and is the one employed by Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS). The cutoffs for the bands/categories presented are based on several factors, including approaches based on the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) ( NIOSH, 2019 ; Dolan et al, 2005 ; Kroes et al, 2004 ; Cramer et al, 1978 ; Gould et al, 2016 ; Guideline, 2018 ). While the TTC may not be originally derived for occupational purposes, the principles have been applied successfully in the field of occupational health and safety for the establishment of safe occupational exposure limits ( Chebekoue and Krishnan, 2017 , 2019 ; Carthew et al, 2009 ; Hoersch et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Occupational Exposure Control Bandingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genotoxicity is an endpoint which needs additional expert consideration with respect to the underlying mechanism of genotoxic effects since they may or may not be a part of the intended effects of the drugs. The term "genotoxic" has been used broadly to describe toxicological endpoints such as mutagenicity, structural chromosomal damage (clastogenic activity), and numerical chromosome aberrations (aneugenic activity), as well as end points not routinely used such as sister chromatid exchanges or unscheduled DNA synthesis (Gould et al, 2016). Within this context, the term mutagenicity more specifically describes DNA-reactive substances that have a potential to directly cause DNA damage, often even when present at low levels, leading to damage and therefore potentially initiating cancer (eg, alkylating agents or some DNA intercalators).…”
Section: Interpretation Of Genotoxic Dose-response Effects For Dsmentioning
confidence: 99%