2007
DOI: 10.1093/comjnl/bxm076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Special Interest Messaging: A Comparison of IGM Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach is scalable to a significantly large sized network without relying on any centralized architecture and relevant information flow between and within the groups/peers in the network. Cutting et al (2007) propose implicit group definition based on tags used by users to identify interesting content. Peers interested in the same content tags are considered to belong to the same implicit group.…”
Section: Results Of Abstracted Simulation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach is scalable to a significantly large sized network without relying on any centralized architecture and relevant information flow between and within the groups/peers in the network. Cutting et al (2007) propose implicit group definition based on tags used by users to identify interesting content. Peers interested in the same content tags are considered to belong to the same implicit group.…”
Section: Results Of Abstracted Simulation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cutting et al [13] propose implicit group definition based on tags used by users to identify interesting content. Peers interested on the same content tags are considered to belong to the same implicit group.…”
Section: B Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%