2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Special interests and the media: Theory and an application to climate change

Abstract: A journalist reports to a voter on an unknown, policy-relevant state. Competing special interests can make claims that contradict the facts but seem credible to the voter. A reputational incentive to avoid taking sides leads the journalist to report special interests’ claims to the voter. In equilibrium, the voter can remain uninformed even when the journalist is perfectly informed. Communication is improved if the journalist discloses her partisan leanings. The model provides an account of persistent public i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another assumption is that, in the absence of miscommunication, scientific knowledge disseminates widely and with no additional cost to citizens. In reality, knowledge diffusion may be imperfect and costly, and may depend on decisions by other agents such as journalists and media owners (Shapiro 2016). More generally, misperceptions may have a variety of causes, such as lack of Bayesian rationality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another assumption is that, in the absence of miscommunication, scientific knowledge disseminates widely and with no additional cost to citizens. In reality, knowledge diffusion may be imperfect and costly, and may depend on decisions by other agents such as journalists and media owners (Shapiro 2016). More generally, misperceptions may have a variety of causes, such as lack of Bayesian rationality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, scientific progress plays no role in his analysis. Baron (2005) and Shapiro (2016) model competition between special interests to seek political influence through the news media. They adopt a coarse representation of science where evidence is either uninformative or fully informative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a binary model (binary state and binary action choices for the citizens) the sender tries to influence the beliefs of citizens by sending public signals, and they derive the equilibrium level of media bias. Shapiro (2016) applies the idea of persuasion by multiple senders to climate change. Referring to the fact that media balances both scientific and political views on climate change, and the public does not reach a consensus on global warming, they suggest a political economy model, where the receiver is a voter, who has binary choices, and seeks information about a binary state variable.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy aims to crowd out other, unsponsored, research and relies upon the covert nature of its funding for success. Shapiro () develops a model in which a journalist reports the state of the world to a voter who chooses a policy. The journalist's desire to maintain a reputation for being unbiased can lead him to adopt a policy of “balanced reporting,” in which he reports claims by special interests even when he knows they are not true.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%