Special Issue   Resistance to International Courts: Introduction and Conclusion

Madsen, Mikael Rask; Cebulak, Pola; Wiebusch, Micha

doi:10.2139/ssrn.3132321

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…60 Madsen, Cebulak and Wiebusch similarly observe that 'certain forms of actions require the involvement of governments, notably in many of the actions we describe as backlash: institutional reform, blocking appointments or withholding funding'. 61 State support is likewise recognised by Alter, Helfer and Madsen as the 'Achilles heel' of international tribunals. 62 Several further studies similarly examine resistance to international tribunals through the lens of government disaffection.…”

Section: ]mentioning

confidence: 99%

International Adjudication and Its Discontents: A Pluralist Approach to International Tribunal Backlash

Lovat

2020

Isr. law rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International tribunal backlash remains poorly understood: hampered by conceptual challenges, systematic research into the causes of this phenomenon remains nascent. The present article makes two contributions to advancing this endeavour. First, building on existing literature, it sets out a working definition of international tribunal backlash, tailored to facilitate mixed method empirical research into the causes of backlash across institutions and sectors. Second, drawing on international relations’ pluralist turn, the article provides an analytically eclectic theoretical scaffold for causal analysis of international tribunal backlash, enabling standardised cross-institutional and sectoral comparison without over-simplifying the complexity of backlash in various instances. The article accordingly provides the building blocks for improved understanding of the causes of – and the potential scope to manage – international tribunal backlash across institutions, regions and sectors.

show abstract

Section: ]mentioning

confidence: 99%

International Adjudication and Its Discontents: A Pluralist Approach to International Tribunal Backlash

Lovat

2020

Isr. law rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Special Issue Resistance to International Courts: Introduction and Conclusion

Cited by 1 publication

References 5 publications

International Adjudication and Its Discontents: A Pluralist Approach to International Tribunal Backlash

International Adjudication and Its Discontents: A Pluralist Approach to International Tribunal Backlash

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About