OBJECTIVE: To assess the sensitivity and specificity of flow-volume curves in detecting
central airway obstruction (CAO), and to determine whether their
quantitative and qualitative criteria are associated with the location, type
and degree of obstruction. METHODS: Over a four-month period, we consecutively evaluated patients with
bronchoscopy indicated. Over a one-week period, all patients underwent
clinical evaluation, flow-volume curve, bronchoscopy, and completed a
dyspnea scale. Four reviewers, blinded to quantitative and clinical data,
and bronchoscopy results, classified the morphology of the curves. A fifth
reviewer determined the morphological criteria, as well as the quantitative
criteria. RESULTS: We studied 82 patients, 36 (44%) of whom had CAO. The sensitivity and
specificity of the flow-volume curves in detecting CAO were, respectively,
88.9% and 91.3% (quantitative criteria) and 30.6% and 93.5% (qualitative
criteria). The most prevalent quantitative criteria in our sample were
FEF50%/FIF50% ≥ 1, in 83% of patients, and FEV1/PEF ≥ 8 mL . L–1
. min–1, in 36%, both being associated with the type, location,
and degree of obstruction (p < 0.05). There was concordance among the
reviewers as to the presence of CAO. There is a relationship between the
degree of obstruction and dyspnea. CONCLUSIONS: The quantitative criteria should always be calculated for flow-volume curves
in order to detect CAO, because of the low sensitivity of the qualitative
criteria. Both FEF50%/FIF50% ≥ 1 and FEV1/PEF ≥ 8 mL . L–1 .
min–1 were associated with the location, type and degree of
obstruction.