Special Projects of National Significance Systems Linkages Initiative (2011 to 2016): Improving Access to Care for Hard-to-Reach Populations Living with HIV

Myers, Janet J.; Xavier, Jessica

doi:10.1007/s10461-018-2370-4

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 17 publications

(16 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As part of the UNAIDS 90‐90‐90 initiative to eliminate HIV transmission, substantial effort has focused on addressing the first ‘90’ and increasing HIV testing for ‘at risk’, ‘hard to reach’, and ‘vulnerable’ populations [1–5]. While enhanced community‐based HIV testing attracts much attention [6,7], an often overlooked opportunity for expanded HIV testing and diagnosis exists within the healthcare system itself [8–10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Economic impact on direct healthcare costs of missing opportunities for diagnosing HIV within healthcare settings

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The economic consequences of a missed opportunity for HIV testing at an earlier stage of infection within a healthcare setting are poorly described. Methods For all newly diagnosed HIV patients followed at the Southern Alberta HIV/AIDS Clinic (SAC), Calgary, Canada, between 1 April 2011 and 1 April 2016, all clinical encounters occurring < 3 years prior to diagnosis within the region were obtained. The direct costs of HIV care after diagnosis to 31 March 2019 were determined from a payers’ perspective and reported as mean cost per patient per month (PPPM) in 2019 Canadian dollars (CDN$). Patients with no encounters for 3 years prior to diagnosis were compared with patients with encounters, with special attention to patients with HIV clinical indicator conditions (HCICs). Results Of 388 patients, 60% had one or more prior encounter without HIV testing; 14% had been treated for an HCIC. Females, older patients and heterosexuals were more likely to have prior encounters. At diagnosis, patients with previous encounters presented with lower CD4 counts and higher rates of AIDS. The mean PPPM costs for patients with any prior encounter or for an HCIC‐based encounter were 16% and 33% higher, respectively, than for patients with no prior encounters. While mean PPPM costs for antiretroviral drugs and outpatient visits were slightly higher, in‐patient costs were 10 times higher for people with HIV who had a previous HCIC encounter vs. those with no encounters (CDN$316 vs. $31, respectively). Conclusions Any healthcare visit, especially for an HCIC, represents relatively easy opportunities for HIV testing. Not testing can result in poorer health and higher costs. Targeted clinical testing and novel interventions to correct overlooked testing opportunities within healthcare settings may be an easy way to implement cost savings.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%