2017
DOI: 10.5694/mja16.00949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specialist outreach services in regional and remote Australia: key drivers and policy implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is notable, that the highest overall satisfaction was reported by patients who were visiting physicians (GPs and Specialists) at the outreach clinics as compared to non-medical outreach health professionals. This may be because outreach medical services in Australia are typically provided by specialist doctors who periodically visit the same rural community without any health service fees charged to the patient [ 32 , 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is notable, that the highest overall satisfaction was reported by patients who were visiting physicians (GPs and Specialists) at the outreach clinics as compared to non-medical outreach health professionals. This may be because outreach medical services in Australia are typically provided by specialist doctors who periodically visit the same rural community without any health service fees charged to the patient [ 32 , 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rural communities account for 28% of Australia’s population, out of which 62% are Indigenous Australians [ 25 , 30 ]. However, only 12% of medical specialists reside in rural areas [ 31 , 32 ]. Similarly, rural areas typically have fewer nurses and allied health professionals compared to urban areas [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the foundational principles are consistent with other rural medical contexts, including the centrality of general medicine in rural practice (FP5); [31][32][33][34] the importance of rural immersion (FP4) rather than shorter training attachments; 4,6,8,9,35-37 the interprofessional training and practice context (FP8); 7,34,[38][39][40] and the dynamic complexity of rural specialist work to meet community demand (FP3). 4,6,8,[41][42][43] Together, these principles provide a roadmap for tailoring physician workforce development to each rural community, thereby breaking down barriers to action by stakeholders working collaboratively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preference of many health professionals, particularly medical practitioners, to work in metropolitan areas, has resulted in a mal-distribution of that workforce. While this mal-distribution has been the focus of the Australian Government for many years, it is now increasingly evident that, while the mal-distribution of medical practitioners may continue, driving a shortage in rural and remote areas, there is now a growing overall shortage of nurses in all geographical areas as well as in specific areas of speciality nursing practice [5, 7]. The overall response of the Australian government to address the mal-distribution and shortage has been to increase supply [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%