1994
DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90034-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speciation and phylogenetic resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another interpretation is that cladogensis occurred either simultaneously or in rapid succession (Hoelzer & Melnick 1994), resulting in a polychotomy where practically no opportunity existed for character‐state changes to occur, or in which there is no clade structure to resolve (Page & Phelps 1994). However, it has been argued that explanations involving simultaneous differentiation should be considered only as a last resort (DeSalle et al . 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interpretation is that cladogensis occurred either simultaneously or in rapid succession (Hoelzer & Melnick 1994), resulting in a polychotomy where practically no opportunity existed for character‐state changes to occur, or in which there is no clade structure to resolve (Page & Phelps 1994). However, it has been argued that explanations involving simultaneous differentiation should be considered only as a last resort (DeSalle et al . 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In phylogenetic analysis, polytomous nodes (multifurcations rather than bifurcations) can be considered ‘soft’ (incomplete taxonomic resolution; Maddison 1989; DeSalle, Absher, & Amato 1994) or ‘hard’ (multiple simultaneous splitting events; Hoelzer & Meinick 1994a,b). Unlike ‘hard’ polytomies that reflect the true topology, the presence of ‘soft’ polytomies, which represent missing or ambiguous data, will influence results from many types of phylogenetic analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematists generally seek fully resolved trees, which may yield stronger inferences about character evolution or biogeographic history, and usually view polytomies as reflecting uncertainty about relationships. Such "soft" polytomies may be due to insufficient data and often can be resolved by adding more or different kinds of characters (Maddison, 1989;DeSalle et al, 1994). In contrast, a "hard" polytomy represents the simultaneous origin of three or more species (or gene lineages) from a common ancestor and has no bifurcating solution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%