2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.00543.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speciation of sulphur in soils and soil particles by X‐ray spectromicroscopy

Abstract: Summary Current wet chemical methods for the speciation of sulphur (S) in soils are inaccurate and do not allow one to assess the S speciation of individual soil particles and colloids. X‐ray microscopy and Near Edge X‐ray Absorption Fine structure Spectroscopy (NEXAFS) can be used to study individual species of S at the K‐adsorption edge. We have used these techniques to identify and quantify S species in bulk soil, soil particles and colloids from Oh and Bh horizons of two forested Podzols. The partitioning … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
98
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancy in these sets of values could be caused by limitations in the comparability of the two sulfur speciation techniques for different subgroups of organic sulfur fractions. Prietzel et al (2003) and Solomon et al (2003) suggested that the wet-chemical technique relies on the differential reduction of organic sulfur compounds to H 2 S and thus it might not recover all the organic sulfur fractions compared to NEXAFS, which is a more direct and nondestructive technique. The shortcoming of sulfur K-edge NEXAFS spectroscopy, however, is its inability to discriminate precisely between soil organic sulfur forms with an oxidation state of 0 to +1 (polysulfides, disulfides, thiols, monosulfides, and thiophenes).…”
Section: Relationship With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The discrepancy in these sets of values could be caused by limitations in the comparability of the two sulfur speciation techniques for different subgroups of organic sulfur fractions. Prietzel et al (2003) and Solomon et al (2003) suggested that the wet-chemical technique relies on the differential reduction of organic sulfur compounds to H 2 S and thus it might not recover all the organic sulfur fractions compared to NEXAFS, which is a more direct and nondestructive technique. The shortcoming of sulfur K-edge NEXAFS spectroscopy, however, is its inability to discriminate precisely between soil organic sulfur forms with an oxidation state of 0 to +1 (polysulfides, disulfides, thiols, monosulfides, and thiophenes).…”
Section: Relationship With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A generally greater amount of reduced organic sulfur was also found in temperate forest soils (Prietzel et al, 2003) or wetlands (Jokic et al, 2003) than in well-drained agricultural soil (Solomon et al, 2003(Solomon et al, , 2005b. Forms of organic sulfur appear to react significantly to the oxygen environment, with the lowest degree of oxidation in submerged soils and the highest in agricultural soils (Zhao et al, 2006).…”
Section: Composition Of Natural Organicmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Depending on the SOFC temperature under investigation, the establishment took several hours at start up to 15e30 min at lower temperatures. S K-edge X-ray absorption near edge structure spectroscopy (XANES) at the sulphur K-edge can be used to identify and quantify sulphur atoms exhibiting different oxidation states and molecular structure and those being part of different functional groups [44]. A powerful statistical tool facilitating the speciation analysis is principal component analysis (PCA), allowing estimating the minimal number of independent signal patterns ("principal components", PCs) needed to reproduce a set of data, here the in-total eight operando-recorded S K-edge XANES spectra.…”
Section: Sulphur Speciation With the Operando-recorded Xanes Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%