2019
DOI: 10.1163/18759866-20191344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speciation with gene flow in marine systems

Abstract: Over the last century, a large body of literature emerged on mechanisms driving speciation. Most of the research into these questions focussed on terrestrial systems, while research in marine systems lagged behind. Here, we review the population genetic mechanisms and geographic context of 33 potential cases of speciation with gene flow in the marine realm, using six criteria inferred from theoretical models of speciation. Speciation with gene flow occurs in a wide range of marine taxa. Single traits, which in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 290 publications
(355 reference statements)
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genome‐wide SNP data from six sympatric populations of C. violacea revealed two clearly differentiated clusters that were largely concordant with coral host, consistent with results from mitochondrial DNA (Simmonds et al, ). As with insects (Jean & Jean‐Christophe, ; Simon et al, ), this genome‐wide differentiation supports the conclusion of ecological divergence based on host association and adds to a small but growing literature on ecological divergence in marine environments (Fritts‐Penniman et al, ; Potkamp & Fransen, ; Titus, Blischak, & Daly, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Genome‐wide SNP data from six sympatric populations of C. violacea revealed two clearly differentiated clusters that were largely concordant with coral host, consistent with results from mitochondrial DNA (Simmonds et al, ). As with insects (Jean & Jean‐Christophe, ; Simon et al, ), this genome‐wide differentiation supports the conclusion of ecological divergence based on host association and adds to a small but growing literature on ecological divergence in marine environments (Fritts‐Penniman et al, ; Potkamp & Fransen, ; Titus, Blischak, & Daly, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Jean & Jean-Christophe, 2010;Simon et al, 2015), this genome-wide differentiation supports the conclusion of ecological divergence based on host association and adds to a small but growing literature on ecological divergence in marine environmentsPotkamp & Fransen, 2019;Titus, Blischak, & Daly, 2019).While SNP data reveal significant divergence between host-specific lineages of C. violacea, divergence was substantially lower in genome-wide SNPs compared to mtDNA (F ST = 0.047 vs. Φ CT = 0.561).This result may partially be a function of the smaller effective population size of the mitochondrial genome(Palumbi, Cipriano, & Hare, 2001). However, lower divergence values also suggest intermediate levels of gene flow between distinct host-associated lineages (Nm>10), values that are similar to other cases of sympatric host-associated divergence (e.g.,Gouin et al, 2017;Peccoud, Ollivier, Plantegenest, & Simon, 2009;Smadja et al, 2012).…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could be due to the very likely fact that the diversification of extant coral genera occurred much earlier than the radiation of extant coral-associated Zanclea. One of the main mechanisms underlying Zanclea radiation, acting both alone and in conjunction with geography-related processes, may be host-switching to exploit new resources and subsequent specialisation of the association and reproductive isolation, as shown in other coral-associated taxa (see review by Potkamp and Fransen 2018). This scenario may apply especially for specialist Zanclea clades.…”
Section: Relationships Among Zanclea Clades and Their Scleractinian Hmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Until now there are no unequivocal and universal criteria for species delimitations when the underlying evolutionary processes and phylogenies are taken into consideration (e.g., Zachos et al, 2013;González et al, 2018;Stanton et al, 2019;Platania et al, 2020), and even for the existence of species at all (Ereshefsky, 1998;Willis, 2017;Reydon & Kunz, 2019). At the conceptual level, more than 26 different species concepts have been suggested (Zachos, 2016) but at a practical level even the most widely acclaimed criterion of reproductive isolation (Mayr, 1969(Mayr, , 1982 is not robust as has been shown on numerous occasions (e.g., McDonald and Koehn, 1988;Mallet, 2005;Kijewski et al, 2006;Harrison & Larson, 2014;Jančúchová-Lásková et al, 2015;Crossman et al, 2016;Fraïsse et al, 2016;Potkamp & Fransen, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%