2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species distribution models can be highly sensitive to algorithm configuration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To simplify the interpretation of results and for a better comparison between taxa, we decided to keep the default settings of the algorithms, which may have resulted in uncertainty regarding model performance and resulting species distribution due to the differential sensitivity of each algorithm to species modelled, sampling effort and evaluation metric (Hallgren et al., 2019). We recommend investigating the sensitivity of the algorithms to their configuration settings on the resulting projected species distribution (Hallgren et al., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To simplify the interpretation of results and for a better comparison between taxa, we decided to keep the default settings of the algorithms, which may have resulted in uncertainty regarding model performance and resulting species distribution due to the differential sensitivity of each algorithm to species modelled, sampling effort and evaluation metric (Hallgren et al., 2019). We recommend investigating the sensitivity of the algorithms to their configuration settings on the resulting projected species distribution (Hallgren et al., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simplify the interpretation of results and for a better comparison between taxa, we decided to keep the default settings of the algorithms, which may have resulted in uncertainty regarding model performance and resulting species distribution due to the differential sensitivity of each algorithm to species modelled, sampling effort and evaluation metric (Hallgren et al., 2019). We recommend investigating the sensitivity of the algorithms to their configuration settings on the resulting projected species distribution (Hallgren et al., 2019). In addition, we relied on pseudo‐absences instead of true absences and considered a greater number of randomly selected pseudo‐absence points for those taxa with a larger study region, which may have introduced uncertainty given the differential sensitivity of each algorithm to the number of pseudo‐absences (Barbet‐Massin et al., 2012; Guillera‐Arroita et al., 2015; Phillips et al., 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum entropy (MaxEnt) [13] and support vector machines (SVMs) [14,15] are flexible and very powerful techniques. MaxEnt is a machine learning algorithm with a high capability in artificial fitting rules or functional connections (e.g., nonlinear relation) according to appearance information, usage of species' presence, and background data for the prediction of species distribution and habitat suitability [8,[16][17][18]. The MaxEnt algorithm is applied to detect the maximum entropy distribution likelihood and is used to forecast the possible distribution of a target species according to its maximum entropy under different conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the performance of the Maxent models is known to be notably influenced by the background point selection, environmental variable selection, feature types, and regularization parameters ( 75 , 98 100 ), we tested different alternatives regarding them. For the selection of background points, we tested two options: we either (i) used the 10,000 points randomly selected in the Swiss territory or (ii) used only the random points situated below 1,500 m in altitude, where tick occurrence is more likely.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%