1992
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4017(92)90078-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species of coccidia occurring in lambs in São Paulo State, Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the sporulation process, the samples were centrifuged for 10 minutes at a rotation of 595.1 g, and were then placed between a slide and cover slip and observed under a microscope at magnifications of up to 400X (HOFFMAN, 1987). The species were differentiated from each other in terms of the oocyst characteristics of shape, color, size and presence or absence of micropyles and micropylar hoods, along with the morphological characteristics of the sporocysts, in accordance with the parameters of Amarante and Barbosa (1992).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the sporulation process, the samples were centrifuged for 10 minutes at a rotation of 595.1 g, and were then placed between a slide and cover slip and observed under a microscope at magnifications of up to 400X (HOFFMAN, 1987). The species were differentiated from each other in terms of the oocyst characteristics of shape, color, size and presence or absence of micropyles and micropylar hoods, along with the morphological characteristics of the sporocysts, in accordance with the parameters of Amarante and Barbosa (1992).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For specifi c identifi cation, one hundred oocysts of each species were measured with a Leica LAS light microscope coupled to a computer system. Species differentiation was performed according to shape, color, presence or absence of micropyle and micropilar cap, oocyst size, and morphological characteristics of sporocysts following the criteria established by VERCRUYSSE (1982), AMARANTE & BARBOSA (1992), SOMMER et al (1998), andDAUGSCHIES &NAJDROWSKI, (2005).…”
Section: Location and Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This disease leads to economic losses due to high mortality and morbidity, low growth performance; reduce in productivity and treatment costs (Kaya 2004;Temizel et al 2011). Surveys based on the examination of ruminant faeces have shown that most animals are infected with a wide variety of Eimeria species from an early age (Vercruysse 1982;O'Callaghan et al 1987;Amarante and Barbosa 1992). In sheep, several species of Eimeria have been recognized including E. ahsata, E. bakuensis, E.crandallis, E. faurei, E. granulosa, E. gonzalezi, E. gilruthi, E. intricata, E. marsica, E. ovinoidalis, E. pallida, E. parva, E. punctata and E. weybridgensis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%