2001
DOI: 10.1080/10635150118650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species or Supraspecific Taxa as Terminals in Cladistic Analysis? Groundplans Versus Exemplars Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
137
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
3
137
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Exemplar species were coded for this study following the recommendations of Prendini (2001). However, since immature stages have been unequivocally associated with adults for only a handful of species within each genus, characters of the immature stages for a particular exemplar species may not reflect observations of that species' semaphoront, but of a closely related species from the same biogeographic region (Appendix 3, Polycentropus zaneta Denning, 1948 for P. flavomaculatus Pictet, 1834 and Pseudoneureclipsis lusitanicus Malicky, 1980 for P. saccheda Schmid & Denning, 1979).…”
Section: Taxon Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exemplar species were coded for this study following the recommendations of Prendini (2001). However, since immature stages have been unequivocally associated with adults for only a handful of species within each genus, characters of the immature stages for a particular exemplar species may not reflect observations of that species' semaphoront, but of a closely related species from the same biogeographic region (Appendix 3, Polycentropus zaneta Denning, 1948 for P. flavomaculatus Pictet, 1834 and Pseudoneureclipsis lusitanicus Malicky, 1980 for P. saccheda Schmid & Denning, 1979).…”
Section: Taxon Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining three terminals, Tyrannosaurus , Dilong , and Compsognathidae Cope 1871 [110], comprise basal members of Coelurosauria, the established sister taxon to Allosauroidea [12], [14], [17]. Although the use of the supraspecific taxa Coelophysoidea and Compsognathidae is not ideal [111], evaluating every distinct terminal within those clades is outside the scope of the present analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this analysis I used exemplars of the various taxa, both outgroup and ingroup, and thus made no a priori assumptions about probable direction of state changes, and thereby also included estimates of polymorphisms. Exemplars rather than groundplans were utilised, as advocated by Prendini (2001), but scorings for individual specimens were often combined to produce “summary” terminals with specified polymorphisms (see Table 1) rather than maintaining them as separate terminals. Since Chrysidoidea is the sister group of Aculeata s.str.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%