2008
DOI: 10.1897/07-339.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species sensitivity distributions for suspended clays, sediment burial, and grain size change in the marine environment

Abstract: Assessment of the environmental risk of discharges, containing both chemicals and suspended solids (e.g., drilling discharges to the marine environment), requires an evaluation of the effects of both toxic and nontoxic pollutants. To date, a structured evaluation scheme that can be used for prognostic risk assessments for nontoxic stress is lacking. In the present study we challenge this lack of information by the development of marine species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) for three nontoxic stressors: susp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
79
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
79
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, while tailings addition resulted in an upward shift of the entire macrofauna community, dead sediment addition resulted in a less clear distinction between surface and subsurface community composition, compared to the control situation. The stress response of macrofauna is species-specific and depends on their mobility, oxygen requirements, and feeding type (Chou et al, 2004;Hinchey et al, 2006;Smit et al, 2008). In a metanalysis, Smit et al (2008) predicted from marine species sensitivity distributions that instantaneous burial with 5.4 cm of natural sediment would negatively affect about half of the 32 analyzed macrofauna species.…”
Section: Substrate Addition Induces Structural Changes Of the Benthicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, while tailings addition resulted in an upward shift of the entire macrofauna community, dead sediment addition resulted in a less clear distinction between surface and subsurface community composition, compared to the control situation. The stress response of macrofauna is species-specific and depends on their mobility, oxygen requirements, and feeding type (Chou et al, 2004;Hinchey et al, 2006;Smit et al, 2008). In a metanalysis, Smit et al (2008) predicted from marine species sensitivity distributions that instantaneous burial with 5.4 cm of natural sediment would negatively affect about half of the 32 analyzed macrofauna species.…”
Section: Substrate Addition Induces Structural Changes Of the Benthicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stress response of macrofauna is species-specific and depends on their mobility, oxygen requirements, and feeding type (Chou et al, 2004;Hinchey et al, 2006;Smit et al, 2008). In a metanalysis, Smit et al (2008) predicted from marine species sensitivity distributions that instantaneous burial with 5.4 cm of natural sediment would negatively affect about half of the 32 analyzed macrofauna species. Furthermore, burial with 0.63 cm already affected 5% of the tested macrofauna species.…”
Section: Substrate Addition Induces Structural Changes Of the Benthicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A SSD is a statistical distribution that describes the variation between species in sensitivity to an environmental stressor (Leuven et al 2007(Leuven et al , 2011Posthuma et al 2002;Smit et al 2008). In our study, the calculated fraction of species affected is addressed as the potentially not occurring fraction (PNOF) (van Zelm et al 2007), representing the fraction of mollusc species potentially excluded from the river Rhine because of water temperature and salinity limitations.…”
Section: Species Sensitivity Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary response of benthic organisms to a physical disturbance is often severe damage or mortality (Bolam and Rees, 2003;Kaiser et al, 2006;Collie et al, 2000). Particularly impacted are sedentary organisms and filter feeders, such as anemones, soft corals and bivalve species (Kaiser et al, 2002;Widdicombe and Austen, 2001;Thrush and Dayton, 2002;Smit et al, 2008). This can result in a number of changes in benthic communities, including loss of habitatstructuring species, substantial decline in taxon abundance, and changes in species richness (Kaiser et al, 2002;Thrush and Dayton, 2002;Hiddink et al, 2006).…”
Section: Cause-effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benthic impacts were quantified based on the initial benthic response and a recovery rate derived from empirical studies on recovery of benthic communities after particle disposal. The initial benthic response was quantified based on an SSD developed from laboratory studies on effects of particle deposition (burial) on several benthic species (Smit et al, 2008). Characterization factors are expressed as potentially affected fraction of species per volume of sediment.…”
Section: Quantitative Approaches and Lca Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%