1979
DOI: 10.1002/dev.420120112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species‐specific auditory discrimination in bobwhite quail neonates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
80
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results parallel those obtained with normally hatched chicks, who also exhibit a significant preference for their species-typical maternal call at these ages (Heaton et al, 1978;Lickliter & Virkar, 1989).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These results parallel those obtained with normally hatched chicks, who also exhibit a significant preference for their species-typical maternal call at these ages (Heaton et al, 1978;Lickliter & Virkar, 1989).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The increase in unbiased subjects observed in all three species, rather than an increase in the nonspecies typical pattern (for example, a significant increase in left footedness rather than right footedness) further supports the idea that late stage hatching behaviors are a canalizing influence on the development of postnatal motor laterality in these species. Moreover, the egg opening procedures used to disrupt hatching behaviors in this study have been routinely employed for over 80 years (see Oppenheim, Levin, & Harth, 1973 for a review of egg-opening techniques) and do not appear to have a negative influence on the development of other forms of species typical behavior (Gottlieb, 1968(Gottlieb, , 1971Gottlieb, Tomlinson, & Radell, 1989;Rogers & Workman, 1989), physiological processes and brain function (Rogers, 1982;Vince, 1972), prenatal auditory learning (Sleigh, Columbus, & Lickliter, 1996), sensory dominance hierarchies (Lickliter, 1994;McBride & Lickliter, 1995), intersensory functioning (Lickliter, 1990a;Lickliter & Virkar, 1989;Radell & Gottlieb, 1992), reproductive behaviors and visual discrimination abilities (Rogers, 1990), and a wide range of perceptual abilities (Banker & Lickliter, 1993;Heaton & Galleher, 1981;Heaton, Miller, & Goodwin, 1978;Lickliter, 1990b;Lickliter & Lewkowicz, 1995;Lickliter & Stoumbos, 1991;Sleigh & Lickliter, 1995, 1996. Indeed, the negative effects of disrupting the final stages of hatching seem to be specific to the development of postnatal motor biases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All significance levels reported are two-tailed. Heaton et al (1978) were able to demonstrate that experimentally naive bobwhite quail chicks show a high degree of responsiveness to their species-typical maternal call in both single and simultaneous auditory choice tests. However, in their study chicks were tested only at 24 hr following hatching.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%