2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00343-020-0160-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species-specific detection and quantification of scyphomedusae in Jiaozhou Bay, China, using a quantitative real-time PCR assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Environmental DNA (eDNA) techniques, which detect the DNA fragments directly extracted from the environment including DNA from living cells shed by organisms and extracellular DNA freed from cells after an organism dies (Nielsen et al., 2007 ), have emerged as a potential powerful tool to assess aquatic community structures in a specified area. A species‐specific quantitative PCR method utilizes targeted primers focusing on the detection of a few targeted species (e.g., Bolte et al., 2021 ; Gaynor et al., 2017 ; Minamoto et al., 2017 ; Ogata et al., 2021 ; Sathirapongsasuti et al., 2021 ; Takahashi et al., 2020 ; Takasu et al., 2019 ; Wang et al., 2021 ). In contrast, the detection of multiple species can be undertaken through general metabarcoding using conserved primers (e.g., Alexander et al., 2020 ; Ames et al., 2021 ; Beentjes et al., 2022 ; Clark et al., 2020 ; Euclide et al., 2021 ; Pappalardo et al., 2021 ), which is advantageous in biodiversity surveys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental DNA (eDNA) techniques, which detect the DNA fragments directly extracted from the environment including DNA from living cells shed by organisms and extracellular DNA freed from cells after an organism dies (Nielsen et al., 2007 ), have emerged as a potential powerful tool to assess aquatic community structures in a specified area. A species‐specific quantitative PCR method utilizes targeted primers focusing on the detection of a few targeted species (e.g., Bolte et al., 2021 ; Gaynor et al., 2017 ; Minamoto et al., 2017 ; Ogata et al., 2021 ; Sathirapongsasuti et al., 2021 ; Takahashi et al., 2020 ; Takasu et al., 2019 ; Wang et al., 2021 ). In contrast, the detection of multiple species can be undertaken through general metabarcoding using conserved primers (e.g., Alexander et al., 2020 ; Ames et al., 2021 ; Beentjes et al., 2022 ; Clark et al., 2020 ; Euclide et al., 2021 ; Pappalardo et al., 2021 ), which is advantageous in biodiversity surveys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%